On the Benefits and Limitations of Modulated Damping With Passive Motor Control

Abstract

Conventional emulated damping, in which velocity feedback is employed in combination with motor current control to emulate damping, is used in a number of mechatronic applications. As known in the field, although such damping should be strictly passive, several implementation factors render this emulation nonpassive and subject to instability, especially with increasing damping ratios. This paper describes an alternative implementation of emulated damping that employs passive motor control, which does not draw energy from a battery or any other power source. The method is specifically described in the context of a brushless direct-current (BLDC) motor; an unique controller architecture is used along with a particular MOSFET switching scheme which employs only a subset of the standard BLDC motor driver and does not require electronic commutation. This paper employs analytical and experimental means to compare damping control with the described passive motor approach, relative to using a conventional BLDC motor control approach. Stability considerations for each scheme are discussed. Benchtop testing demonstrates the advantage of the passive control scheme in terms of providing smooth behavior, enhancing control robustness, preventing energy leaks, and providing accurate behavior. The special cases of unilateral and asymmetric behaviors (i.e., different damping command for each direction of rotation) are also considered.