YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Mechanical Characterization of Thermal Interface Materials and Its Challenges

    Source: Journal of Electronic Packaging:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 001::page 10804
    Author:
    Subramanian, Vijay
    ,
    Sanchez, Jorge
    ,
    Bautista, Joseph
    ,
    He, Yi
    ,
    Wang, Jinlin
    ,
    Das, Abhishek
    ,
    Schuldes, Jesus Gerardo Reyes
    ,
    Yazzie, Kyle
    ,
    Dhavaleswarapu, Hemanth K.
    ,
    Malatkar, Pramod
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4042805
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Thermal interface materials (TIMs) play a vital role in the performance of electronic packages by enabling improved heat dissipation. These materials typically have high thermal conductivity and are designed to offer a lower thermal resistance path for efficient heat transfer. For some semiconductor components, thermal solutions are attached directly to the bare silicon die using TIM materials, while other components use an integrated heat spreader (IHS) attached on top of the die(s) and the thermal solution attached on top of the IHS. For cases with an IHS, two TIM materials are used—TIM1 is applied between the silicon die and IHS and TIM2 is used between IHS and thermal solution. TIM materials are usually comprised of a polymer matrix with thermally conductive fillers such as silica, aluminum, alumina, boron nitride, zinc oxide, etc. The polymer matrix wets the contact surface to lower the contact resistance, while the fillers help reduce the bulk resistance by increasing the bulk thermal conductivity. TIM thickness varies by application but is typically between 25 μm and around 250 μm. Selection of appropriate TIM1 and TIM2 materials is necessary for the reliable thermal performance of a product over its life and end-use conditions. It has been observed that during reliability testing, TIM materials are prone to degradation which in turn leads to a reduction in the thermal performance of the product. Typical material degradation is in the form of hardening, compression set, interfacial delamination, voiding, or excessive bleed-out. Therefore, in order to identify viable TIM materials, characterization of the thermomechanical behavior of these materials becomes important. However, developing effective metrologies for TIM characterization is difficult for two reasons: TIM materials are very soft, and the sample thickness is very small. Therefore, a well-designed test setup and a repeatable sample preparation and test procedure are needed to overcome these challenges and to obtain reliable data. In this paper, we will share some of the TIM characterization techniques developed for TIM material down-selection. The focus will be on mechanical characterization of TIM materials—including modulus, compression set, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), adhesion strength, and pump-out/bleed-out measurement techniques. Also, results from several TIM formulations, such as polymer TIMs and thermal gap pads, will be shared.
    • Download: (2.178Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Mechanical Characterization of Thermal Interface Materials and Its Challenges

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4257828
    Collections
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSubramanian, Vijay
    contributor authorSanchez, Jorge
    contributor authorBautista, Joseph
    contributor authorHe, Yi
    contributor authorWang, Jinlin
    contributor authorDas, Abhishek
    contributor authorSchuldes, Jesus Gerardo Reyes
    contributor authorYazzie, Kyle
    contributor authorDhavaleswarapu, Hemanth K.
    contributor authorMalatkar, Pramod
    date accessioned2019-06-08T09:29:58Z
    date available2019-06-08T09:29:58Z
    date copyright3/13/2019 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2019
    identifier issn1043-7398
    identifier otherep_141_01_010804.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4257828
    description abstractThermal interface materials (TIMs) play a vital role in the performance of electronic packages by enabling improved heat dissipation. These materials typically have high thermal conductivity and are designed to offer a lower thermal resistance path for efficient heat transfer. For some semiconductor components, thermal solutions are attached directly to the bare silicon die using TIM materials, while other components use an integrated heat spreader (IHS) attached on top of the die(s) and the thermal solution attached on top of the IHS. For cases with an IHS, two TIM materials are used—TIM1 is applied between the silicon die and IHS and TIM2 is used between IHS and thermal solution. TIM materials are usually comprised of a polymer matrix with thermally conductive fillers such as silica, aluminum, alumina, boron nitride, zinc oxide, etc. The polymer matrix wets the contact surface to lower the contact resistance, while the fillers help reduce the bulk resistance by increasing the bulk thermal conductivity. TIM thickness varies by application but is typically between 25 μm and around 250 μm. Selection of appropriate TIM1 and TIM2 materials is necessary for the reliable thermal performance of a product over its life and end-use conditions. It has been observed that during reliability testing, TIM materials are prone to degradation which in turn leads to a reduction in the thermal performance of the product. Typical material degradation is in the form of hardening, compression set, interfacial delamination, voiding, or excessive bleed-out. Therefore, in order to identify viable TIM materials, characterization of the thermomechanical behavior of these materials becomes important. However, developing effective metrologies for TIM characterization is difficult for two reasons: TIM materials are very soft, and the sample thickness is very small. Therefore, a well-designed test setup and a repeatable sample preparation and test procedure are needed to overcome these challenges and to obtain reliable data. In this paper, we will share some of the TIM characterization techniques developed for TIM material down-selection. The focus will be on mechanical characterization of TIM materials—including modulus, compression set, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), adhesion strength, and pump-out/bleed-out measurement techniques. Also, results from several TIM formulations, such as polymer TIMs and thermal gap pads, will be shared.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMechanical Characterization of Thermal Interface Materials and Its Challenges
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Electronic Packaging
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4042805
    journal fristpage10804
    journal lastpage010804-10
    treeJournal of Electronic Packaging:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian