Efficiency of Solar Electricity Production With Long Term StorageSource: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 001::page 11007DOI: 10.1115/1.4028140Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Solar electric production systems with energy storage were simulated and compared, including an ammonia thermochemical cycle, compressed air energy storage (CAES), pumped hydroelectric energy storage (PHES), vanadium flow battery, and thermal energy storage (TES). All systems used the same parabolic concentrator to collect solar energy and Stirling engine to produce electricity. Efficiency and storage losses were modeled after existing experiments. At receiver and ammonia synthesis temperatures of 800 K, efficiencies of all systems except TES were initially similar at 17–19%, while TES provided ∼23%. Further, TES was most efficient for diurnalscale storage. However, lower timedependent storage losses caused the ammonia system to have the highest efficiency after one month of storage and to be increasingly favored as time of storage increased. Solar electric production with full capacity factor may be most efficient with a combination of systems including direct solarelectric production and systems with both diurnal and longterm storage.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Shakeri, Mostafa | |
| contributor author | Soltanzadeh, Maryam | |
| contributor author | Eric Berson, R. | |
| contributor author | Keith Sharp, M. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:23:19Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:23:19Z | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier issn | 0199-6231 | |
| identifier other | sol_137_01_011007.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159555 | |
| description abstract | Solar electric production systems with energy storage were simulated and compared, including an ammonia thermochemical cycle, compressed air energy storage (CAES), pumped hydroelectric energy storage (PHES), vanadium flow battery, and thermal energy storage (TES). All systems used the same parabolic concentrator to collect solar energy and Stirling engine to produce electricity. Efficiency and storage losses were modeled after existing experiments. At receiver and ammonia synthesis temperatures of 800 K, efficiencies of all systems except TES were initially similar at 17–19%, while TES provided ∼23%. Further, TES was most efficient for diurnalscale storage. However, lower timedependent storage losses caused the ammonia system to have the highest efficiency after one month of storage and to be increasingly favored as time of storage increased. Solar electric production with full capacity factor may be most efficient with a combination of systems including direct solarelectric production and systems with both diurnal and longterm storage. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Efficiency of Solar Electricity Production With Long Term Storage | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 137 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4028140 | |
| journal fristpage | 11007 | |
| journal lastpage | 11007 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8986 | |
| tree | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |