Show simple item record

contributor authorShakeri, Mostafa
contributor authorSoltanzadeh, Maryam
contributor authorEric Berson, R.
contributor authorKeith Sharp, M.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:23:19Z
date available2017-05-09T01:23:19Z
date issued2015
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier othersol_137_01_011007.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159555
description abstractSolar electric production systems with energy storage were simulated and compared, including an ammonia thermochemical cycle, compressed air energy storage (CAES), pumped hydroelectric energy storage (PHES), vanadium flow battery, and thermal energy storage (TES). All systems used the same parabolic concentrator to collect solar energy and Stirling engine to produce electricity. Efficiency and storage losses were modeled after existing experiments. At receiver and ammonia synthesis temperatures of 800 K, efficiencies of all systems except TES were initially similar at 17–19%, while TES provided ∼23%. Further, TES was most efficient for diurnalscale storage. However, lower timedependent storage losses caused the ammonia system to have the highest efficiency after one month of storage and to be increasingly favored as time of storage increased. Solar electric production with full capacity factor may be most efficient with a combination of systems including direct solarelectric production and systems with both diurnal and longterm storage.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleEfficiency of Solar Electricity Production With Long Term Storage
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4028140
journal fristpage11007
journal lastpage11007
identifier eissn1528-8986
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record