YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Argument Against Augmenting the Lagrangean for Nonholonomic Systems

    Source: Journal of Applied Mechanics:;2009:;volume( 076 ):;issue: 003::page 34501
    Author:
    Carlos M. Roithmayr
    ,
    Dewey H. Hodges
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3086435
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Although it is known that correct dynamical equations of motion for a nonholonomic system cannot be obtained from a Lagrangean that has been augmented with a sum of the nonholonomic constraint equations weighted with multipliers, previous publications suggest otherwise. One published example that was proposed in support of augmentation purportedly demonstrates that an accepted method fails to produce correct equations of motion whereas augmentation leads to correct equations. This present paper shows that, in fact, the opposite is true. The correct equations, previously discounted on the basis of a flawed application of the Newton–Euler method, are verified by using Kane’s method together with a new approach for determining the directions of constraint forces.
    keyword(s): Force , Equations AND Equations of motion ,
    • Download: (72.15Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Argument Against Augmenting the Lagrangean for Nonholonomic Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/139755
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCarlos M. Roithmayr
    contributor authorDewey H. Hodges
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:31:18Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:31:18Z
    date copyrightMay, 2009
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0021-8936
    identifier otherJAMCAV-26748#034501_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/139755
    description abstractAlthough it is known that correct dynamical equations of motion for a nonholonomic system cannot be obtained from a Lagrangean that has been augmented with a sum of the nonholonomic constraint equations weighted with multipliers, previous publications suggest otherwise. One published example that was proposed in support of augmentation purportedly demonstrates that an accepted method fails to produce correct equations of motion whereas augmentation leads to correct equations. This present paper shows that, in fact, the opposite is true. The correct equations, previously discounted on the basis of a flawed application of the Newton–Euler method, are verified by using Kane’s method together with a new approach for determining the directions of constraint forces.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAn Argument Against Augmenting the Lagrangean for Nonholonomic Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume76
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3086435
    journal fristpage34501
    identifier eissn1528-9036
    keywordsForce
    keywordsEquations AND Equations of motion
    treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2009:;volume( 076 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian