Show simple item record

contributor authorCarlos M. Roithmayr
contributor authorDewey H. Hodges
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:31:18Z
date available2017-05-09T00:31:18Z
date copyrightMay, 2009
date issued2009
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-26748#034501_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/139755
description abstractAlthough it is known that correct dynamical equations of motion for a nonholonomic system cannot be obtained from a Lagrangean that has been augmented with a sum of the nonholonomic constraint equations weighted with multipliers, previous publications suggest otherwise. One published example that was proposed in support of augmentation purportedly demonstrates that an accepted method fails to produce correct equations of motion whereas augmentation leads to correct equations. This present paper shows that, in fact, the opposite is true. The correct equations, previously discounted on the basis of a flawed application of the Newton–Euler method, are verified by using Kane’s method together with a new approach for determining the directions of constraint forces.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAn Argument Against Augmenting the Lagrangean for Nonholonomic Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume76
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.3086435
journal fristpage34501
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsForce
keywordsEquations AND Equations of motion
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2009:;volume( 076 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record