YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Inner-Loop Control for Electromechanical (EMA) Flight Surface Actuation Systems

    Source: Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 005::page 51002
    Author:
    Saeid Habibi
    ,
    Jeff Roach
    ,
    Greg Luecke
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2936382
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This manuscript pertains to the application of an inner-loop control strategy to electromechanical flight surface actuation systems. Modular electromechanical actuators (EMAs) are increasingly used in lieu of centralized hydraulics for the control of flight surfaces in the aerospace sector. The presence of what is termed as a dead zone in these actuators significantly affects the maneuverability, stability, and the flight profiles of aircrafts that use this actuation concept. The hypothesis of our research is that flight surface actuation systems may be desensitized to the effects of dead zone by using a control strategy with multiple inner loops. The proposed strategy involves (a) high-gain inner-loop velocity control of the driving motor and (b) inner-loop compensation for the differential velocity between the motor versus the aileron. The above hypothesis is confirmed by theoretical and simulated analyses using the model of an EMA flight surface actuator. Our results indicate that for small input signals, this strategy is very effective and that it can (a) considerably increase the bandwidth and the crossover frequency of the system and (b) considerably improve the time response of the system. Further to this analysis, this manuscript presents guidelines for the design of EMA systems.
    keyword(s): Control equipment , Engines , Stress , Feedback , Stiction , Flight , Design , Signals , Transfer functions , Frequency response , Gears AND Electric motors ,
    • Download: (709.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Inner-Loop Control for Electromechanical (EMA) Flight Surface Actuation Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/137650
    Collections
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSaeid Habibi
    contributor authorJeff Roach
    contributor authorGreg Luecke
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:27:23Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:27:23Z
    date copyrightSeptember, 2008
    date issued2008
    identifier issn0022-0434
    identifier otherJDSMAA-26465#051002_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/137650
    description abstractThis manuscript pertains to the application of an inner-loop control strategy to electromechanical flight surface actuation systems. Modular electromechanical actuators (EMAs) are increasingly used in lieu of centralized hydraulics for the control of flight surfaces in the aerospace sector. The presence of what is termed as a dead zone in these actuators significantly affects the maneuverability, stability, and the flight profiles of aircrafts that use this actuation concept. The hypothesis of our research is that flight surface actuation systems may be desensitized to the effects of dead zone by using a control strategy with multiple inner loops. The proposed strategy involves (a) high-gain inner-loop velocity control of the driving motor and (b) inner-loop compensation for the differential velocity between the motor versus the aileron. The above hypothesis is confirmed by theoretical and simulated analyses using the model of an EMA flight surface actuator. Our results indicate that for small input signals, this strategy is very effective and that it can (a) considerably increase the bandwidth and the crossover frequency of the system and (b) considerably improve the time response of the system. Further to this analysis, this manuscript presents guidelines for the design of EMA systems.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleInner-Loop Control for Electromechanical (EMA) Flight Surface Actuation Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume130
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2936382
    journal fristpage51002
    identifier eissn1528-9028
    keywordsControl equipment
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsStress
    keywordsFeedback
    keywordsStiction
    keywordsFlight
    keywordsDesign
    keywordsSignals
    keywordsTransfer functions
    keywordsFrequency response
    keywordsGears AND Electric motors
    treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2008:;volume( 130 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian