YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impermeable Crack and Permeable Crack Assumptions, Which One is More Realistic?

    Source: Journal of Applied Mechanics:;2004:;volume( 071 ):;issue: 004::page 575
    Author:
    Bao-Lin Wang
    ,
    Yiu-Wing Mai
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1748294
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the applicability and effect of the crack-free electrical boundary conditions in piezoelectric fracture. By treating flaws in a medium as notches with a finite width, the results from different electrical boundary condition assumptions on the crack faces are compared. It is found that the electrically impermeable boundary is a reasonable one for engineering problems. Unless the flaw interior is filled with conductive media, the permeable crack assumption may not be directly applied to the fracture of piezoelectric materials in engineering applications.
    keyword(s): Fracture (Materials) , Stress , Thickness , Displacement AND Boundary-value problems ,
    • Download: (68.69Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Impermeable Crack and Permeable Crack Assumptions, Which One is More Realistic?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/129463
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBao-Lin Wang
    contributor authorYiu-Wing Mai
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:12:03Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:12:03Z
    date copyrightJuly, 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0021-8936
    identifier otherJAMCAV-26580#575_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129463
    description abstractThis paper investigates the applicability and effect of the crack-free electrical boundary conditions in piezoelectric fracture. By treating flaws in a medium as notches with a finite width, the results from different electrical boundary condition assumptions on the crack faces are compared. It is found that the electrically impermeable boundary is a reasonable one for engineering problems. Unless the flaw interior is filled with conductive media, the permeable crack assumption may not be directly applied to the fracture of piezoelectric materials in engineering applications.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleImpermeable Crack and Permeable Crack Assumptions, Which One is More Realistic?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume71
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1748294
    journal fristpage575
    journal lastpage578
    identifier eissn1528-9036
    keywordsFracture (Materials)
    keywordsStress
    keywordsThickness
    keywordsDisplacement AND Boundary-value problems
    treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2004:;volume( 071 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian