Show simple item record

contributor authorBao-Lin Wang
contributor authorYiu-Wing Mai
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:12:03Z
date available2017-05-09T00:12:03Z
date copyrightJuly, 2004
date issued2004
identifier issn0021-8936
identifier otherJAMCAV-26580#575_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/129463
description abstractThis paper investigates the applicability and effect of the crack-free electrical boundary conditions in piezoelectric fracture. By treating flaws in a medium as notches with a finite width, the results from different electrical boundary condition assumptions on the crack faces are compared. It is found that the electrically impermeable boundary is a reasonable one for engineering problems. Unless the flaw interior is filled with conductive media, the permeable crack assumption may not be directly applied to the fracture of piezoelectric materials in engineering applications.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleImpermeable Crack and Permeable Crack Assumptions, Which One is More Realistic?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume71
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Applied Mechanics
identifier doi10.1115/1.1748294
journal fristpage575
journal lastpage578
identifier eissn1528-9036
keywordsFracture (Materials)
keywordsStress
keywordsThickness
keywordsDisplacement AND Boundary-value problems
treeJournal of Applied Mechanics:;2004:;volume( 071 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record