YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multi-Input Square Iterative Learning Control With Bounded Inputs

    Source: Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004::page 582
    Author:
    Brian J. Driessen
    ,
    Nader Sadegh
    DOI: 10.1115/1.1513794
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In this paper, we present a very simple modification of the iterative learning control algorithm of S. Arimoto et al. (1984, “Bettering Operation of Robots by Learning,” J. Robot Syst., 1 (2), pp. 123–140) to the case where the inputs are bounded. The Jacobian condition presented in K. Avrachenkov (1998, “Iterative Learning Control Based on Quasi-Newton Methods,” Conference on Decision Control, pp. 170–174) is specified instead of the usual condition specified by Arimoto et al. (1984). (See also K. L. Moore, 1993, Iterative Learning Control for Deterministic Systems, Advances in Industrial Control Series, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.) In particular, the former is a condition for monotonicity in the distance to the solution instead of monotonicity in the output error. This observation allows for a simple extension of the methods of Arimoto et al. (1984) to the case of bounded inputs since the process of moving an input back to a bound if it exceeds it does not affect the contraction mapping property; in fact, the distance to the solution, if anything, can only decrease even further. The usual Jacobian error condition, on the other hand, is not sufficient to guarantee the chopping rule will converge to the solution, as proved herein. To the best of our knowledge, these facts have not been previously pointed out in the iterative learning control literature.
    keyword(s): Errors , Iterative learning control , Algorithms , Jacobian matrices , Robots AND Theorems (Mathematics) ,
    • Download: (53.16Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multi-Input Square Iterative Learning Control With Bounded Inputs

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/126491
    Collections
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrian J. Driessen
    contributor authorNader Sadegh
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:07:02Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:07:02Z
    date copyrightDecember, 2002
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0022-0434
    identifier otherJDSMAA-26308#582_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/126491
    description abstractIn this paper, we present a very simple modification of the iterative learning control algorithm of S. Arimoto et al. (1984, “Bettering Operation of Robots by Learning,” J. Robot Syst., 1 (2), pp. 123–140) to the case where the inputs are bounded. The Jacobian condition presented in K. Avrachenkov (1998, “Iterative Learning Control Based on Quasi-Newton Methods,” Conference on Decision Control, pp. 170–174) is specified instead of the usual condition specified by Arimoto et al. (1984). (See also K. L. Moore, 1993, Iterative Learning Control for Deterministic Systems, Advances in Industrial Control Series, Springer-Verlag, London, UK.) In particular, the former is a condition for monotonicity in the distance to the solution instead of monotonicity in the output error. This observation allows for a simple extension of the methods of Arimoto et al. (1984) to the case of bounded inputs since the process of moving an input back to a bound if it exceeds it does not affect the contraction mapping property; in fact, the distance to the solution, if anything, can only decrease even further. The usual Jacobian error condition, on the other hand, is not sufficient to guarantee the chopping rule will converge to the solution, as proved herein. To the best of our knowledge, these facts have not been previously pointed out in the iterative learning control literature.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMulti-Input Square Iterative Learning Control With Bounded Inputs
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume124
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    identifier doi10.1115/1.1513794
    journal fristpage582
    journal lastpage584
    identifier eissn1528-9028
    keywordsErrors
    keywordsIterative learning control
    keywordsAlgorithms
    keywordsJacobian matrices
    keywordsRobots AND Theorems (Mathematics)
    treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2002:;volume( 124 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian