YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Computational and Experimental Results for Flow and Heat Transfer From an Array of Heated Blocks

    Source: Journal of Electronic Packaging:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 001::page 32
    Author:
    A. M. Anderson
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2792198
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper summarizes computational results for flow and heat transfer over an array ofidealized electronic components and compares them to experimental data. The numerical modeling was performed using a commercial finite control volume computer code (Flotherm1 , by Flomerics) and the results are compared to a set of experimental data. The experimental model consists of a uniform array of eight rows by six columns of solid aluminum blocks (9.5 mm high × 46.5 mm wide × 37.5 mm long) mounted on an adiabatic wall of a channel in forced convection flow. Four channel heights (H/B = 1.5–4.6) and a range of inlet velocities (3.0 to 8.1 m/s) were modelled. The flow was modeled as turbulent flow using the κ-ε turbulence model. Data for the adiabatic heat transfer coefficient had , the superposition kernel function g*, and the channel pressure drop ΔP are compared. The computational results for had are in excellent agreement with the experimental data (within about five percent on average). The computationalresults for g* predict the correct trends (roll off with downstream distance, channel height dependence, and velocity independence). However, values are as much as 50 percent higher than the experimental results which means the computational model under-predicts the amount of cross channel mixing. Computational results for ΔP compare reasonably well (within 20 percent on average).
    keyword(s): Flow (Dynamics) AND Heat transfer ,
    • Download: (603.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Computational and Experimental Results for Flow and Heat Transfer From an Array of Heated Blocks

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/118551
    Collections
    • Journal of Electronic Packaging

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. M. Anderson
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:53:14Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:53:14Z
    date copyrightMarch, 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier issn1528-9044
    identifier otherJEPAE4-26158#32_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/118551
    description abstractThis paper summarizes computational results for flow and heat transfer over an array ofidealized electronic components and compares them to experimental data. The numerical modeling was performed using a commercial finite control volume computer code (Flotherm1 , by Flomerics) and the results are compared to a set of experimental data. The experimental model consists of a uniform array of eight rows by six columns of solid aluminum blocks (9.5 mm high × 46.5 mm wide × 37.5 mm long) mounted on an adiabatic wall of a channel in forced convection flow. Four channel heights (H/B = 1.5–4.6) and a range of inlet velocities (3.0 to 8.1 m/s) were modelled. The flow was modeled as turbulent flow using the κ-ε turbulence model. Data for the adiabatic heat transfer coefficient had , the superposition kernel function g*, and the channel pressure drop ΔP are compared. The computational results for had are in excellent agreement with the experimental data (within about five percent on average). The computationalresults for g* predict the correct trends (roll off with downstream distance, channel height dependence, and velocity independence). However, values are as much as 50 percent higher than the experimental results which means the computational model under-predicts the amount of cross channel mixing. Computational results for ΔP compare reasonably well (within 20 percent on average).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of Computational and Experimental Results for Flow and Heat Transfer From an Array of Heated Blocks
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Electronic Packaging
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2792198
    journal fristpage32
    journal lastpage39
    identifier eissn1043-7398
    keywordsFlow (Dynamics) AND Heat transfer
    treeJournal of Electronic Packaging:;1997:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian