Pressurization of Granular Solid FuelsSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1960:;volume( 082 ):;issue: 002::page 156Author:M. N. Aref
DOI: 10.1115/1.3672742Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The different methods of pressurizing powdered solid fuels which have been developed are reviewed briefly, including proposals as well as those in operation. The work has been devoted particularly to a study of the characteristics of these pressurizers, in relation to their common problems of: (a) Power loss due to venting the pressurizing air, (b) wear of the surfaces in contact with the solids, and (c) effective sealing. The most practical methods have been compared on power loss, rather than power required in their cycles. It has been found that power loss due to air venting cannot be totally eliminated and that the simple lock hopper is, so far, the best available device which has the lower capital cost, maintenance requirements, power loss, and better reliability. Where space is of major importance, however, the lock hopper with a moving wall can be considered as an alternative, though it may suffer from an increased wear rate and a reduced volumetric efficiency.
keyword(s): Fuels , Granular materials , Wear , Locks (Waterways) , Maintenance , Solids , Sealing (Process) , Cycles AND Reliability ,
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | M. N. Aref | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:24:41Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:24:41Z | |
| date copyright | April, 1960 | |
| date issued | 1960 | |
| identifier issn | 1528-8919 | |
| identifier other | JETPEZ-26608#156_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/102389 | |
| description abstract | The different methods of pressurizing powdered solid fuels which have been developed are reviewed briefly, including proposals as well as those in operation. The work has been devoted particularly to a study of the characteristics of these pressurizers, in relation to their common problems of: (a) Power loss due to venting the pressurizing air, (b) wear of the surfaces in contact with the solids, and (c) effective sealing. The most practical methods have been compared on power loss, rather than power required in their cycles. It has been found that power loss due to air venting cannot be totally eliminated and that the simple lock hopper is, so far, the best available device which has the lower capital cost, maintenance requirements, power loss, and better reliability. Where space is of major importance, however, the lock hopper with a moving wall can be considered as an alternative, though it may suffer from an increased wear rate and a reduced volumetric efficiency. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Pressurization of Granular Solid Fuels | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 82 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3672742 | |
| journal fristpage | 156 | |
| journal lastpage | 167 | |
| identifier eissn | 0742-4795 | |
| keywords | Fuels | |
| keywords | Granular materials | |
| keywords | Wear | |
| keywords | Locks (Waterways) | |
| keywords | Maintenance | |
| keywords | Solids | |
| keywords | Sealing (Process) | |
| keywords | Cycles AND Reliability | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1960:;volume( 082 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |