Show simple item record

contributor authorM. N. Aref
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:24:41Z
date available2017-05-08T23:24:41Z
date copyrightApril, 1960
date issued1960
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-26608#156_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/102389
description abstractThe different methods of pressurizing powdered solid fuels which have been developed are reviewed briefly, including proposals as well as those in operation. The work has been devoted particularly to a study of the characteristics of these pressurizers, in relation to their common problems of: (a) Power loss due to venting the pressurizing air, (b) wear of the surfaces in contact with the solids, and (c) effective sealing. The most practical methods have been compared on power loss, rather than power required in their cycles. It has been found that power loss due to air venting cannot be totally eliminated and that the simple lock hopper is, so far, the best available device which has the lower capital cost, maintenance requirements, power loss, and better reliability. Where space is of major importance, however, the lock hopper with a moving wall can be considered as an alternative, though it may suffer from an increased wear rate and a reduced volumetric efficiency.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePressurization of Granular Solid Fuels
typeJournal Paper
journal volume82
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.3672742
journal fristpage156
journal lastpage167
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsFuels
keywordsGranular materials
keywordsWear
keywordsLocks (Waterways)
keywordsMaintenance
keywordsSolids
keywordsSealing (Process)
keywordsCycles AND Reliability
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1960:;volume( 082 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record