YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effect of Residual Shaft Bow on Unbalance Response and Balancing of a Single Mass Flexible Rotor—Part II: Balancing

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1976:;volume( 098 ):;issue: 002::page 182
    Author:
    J. C. Nicholas
    ,
    E. J. Gunter
    ,
    P. E. Allaire
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3446134
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Three methods of balancing a rotor with a residual shaft bow were presented. Method I balanced the total shaft amplitude to zero at the balance speed. Method II balanced the elastic deflection to zero at the balance speed leaving the residual bow amplitude. Method III balanced the total shaft amplitude to zero at the critical speed without actually operating the rotor at the critical. After balancing by Method I, a large amplitude remained near the critical. Method II balanced the rotor to the residual bow amplitude at all speeds except near the critical where the amplitude is slightly larger than the residual amplitude. The optimum balance resulted from balancing by Method III. In this case, the amplitude was less than or equal to the residual bow amplitude for all speeds except at the critical where the amplitude was zero. Method III required that the critical speed be known prior to balancing. For all three balancing methods, the unbalance influence coefficient must be determined. Two procedures for determining this coefficient were discussed. One was the familiar trial weight influence coefficient method and the other was the direct method which does not require trial weights. Part I of this paper discussed the effect of shaft bow on unbalance response.
    keyword(s): Rotors , Deflection AND Weight (Mass) ,
    • Download: (565.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Effect of Residual Shaft Bow on Unbalance Response and Balancing of a Single Mass Flexible Rotor—Part II: Balancing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/88591
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. C. Nicholas
    contributor authorE. J. Gunter
    contributor authorP. E. Allaire
    date accessioned2017-05-08T23:00:37Z
    date available2017-05-08T23:00:37Z
    date copyrightApril, 1976
    date issued1976
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26724#182_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/88591
    description abstractThree methods of balancing a rotor with a residual shaft bow were presented. Method I balanced the total shaft amplitude to zero at the balance speed. Method II balanced the elastic deflection to zero at the balance speed leaving the residual bow amplitude. Method III balanced the total shaft amplitude to zero at the critical speed without actually operating the rotor at the critical. After balancing by Method I, a large amplitude remained near the critical. Method II balanced the rotor to the residual bow amplitude at all speeds except near the critical where the amplitude is slightly larger than the residual amplitude. The optimum balance resulted from balancing by Method III. In this case, the amplitude was less than or equal to the residual bow amplitude for all speeds except at the critical where the amplitude was zero. Method III required that the critical speed be known prior to balancing. For all three balancing methods, the unbalance influence coefficient must be determined. Two procedures for determining this coefficient were discussed. One was the familiar trial weight influence coefficient method and the other was the direct method which does not require trial weights. Part I of this paper discussed the effect of shaft bow on unbalance response.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEffect of Residual Shaft Bow on Unbalance Response and Balancing of a Single Mass Flexible Rotor—Part II: Balancing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume98
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3446134
    journal fristpage182
    journal lastpage187
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsRotors
    keywordsDeflection AND Weight (Mass)
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;1976:;volume( 098 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian