YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Auto-Encoder as Reduced-Order Models for Reconstruction and Prediction of Turbine Blade Temperature Field With Sparse Data

    Source: ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer:;2025:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 007::page 73801-1
    Author:
    Zhang, Yimin
    ,
    Mi, Jin
    ,
    Tong, Zi-Xiang
    ,
    Qiu, Lu
    ,
    Zhu, Jianqin
    ,
    Li, Dike
    ,
    Cheng, Zeyuan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4068389
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Accurately reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades is of significant importance in the field of aero-engines. The complexities in geometries and operation conditions of the blades further complicate these problems, because temperatures can only be acquired from sparse and noisy measurements. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and deep neural network auto-encoder (AE) are two typical reduced-order models to reconstruct the global temperature fields from sparse data points, and they are further combined with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for prediction. In contrast with the linear modes of POD, the nonlinear features of AE may lead to advantages in reconstructing and predicting of temperature fields. A systematic comparison between the two methods is seldom studied in existing research, particularly regarding their noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities. Therefore, a detailed study is conducted in this paper. The two-dimensional cross section of Mark II blades is used as an example; this work compares the performance of POD–LSTM and AE–LSTM in reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades based on sparse and noisy measurement data under transient operating conditions. The results indicate that both reduced-order prediction models achieved low mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) and high computational efficiency for reconstruction and prediction. With 12 sparse data points, the reconstruction error of two methods is comparable. Compared to the POD method, reduction coefficients of the AE method are more robust and have a uniform energy distribution, so AE exhibits superior noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities.
    • Download: (3.547Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Auto-Encoder as Reduced-Order Models for Reconstruction and Prediction of Turbine Blade Temperature Field With Sparse Data

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308664
    Collections
    • ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhang, Yimin
    contributor authorMi, Jin
    contributor authorTong, Zi-Xiang
    contributor authorQiu, Lu
    contributor authorZhu, Jianqin
    contributor authorLi, Dike
    contributor authorCheng, Zeyuan
    date accessioned2025-08-20T09:40:29Z
    date available2025-08-20T09:40:29Z
    date copyright5/6/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier issn2832-8450
    identifier otherht_147_07_073801.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308664
    description abstractAccurately reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades is of significant importance in the field of aero-engines. The complexities in geometries and operation conditions of the blades further complicate these problems, because temperatures can only be acquired from sparse and noisy measurements. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and deep neural network auto-encoder (AE) are two typical reduced-order models to reconstruct the global temperature fields from sparse data points, and they are further combined with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for prediction. In contrast with the linear modes of POD, the nonlinear features of AE may lead to advantages in reconstructing and predicting of temperature fields. A systematic comparison between the two methods is seldom studied in existing research, particularly regarding their noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities. Therefore, a detailed study is conducted in this paper. The two-dimensional cross section of Mark II blades is used as an example; this work compares the performance of POD–LSTM and AE–LSTM in reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades based on sparse and noisy measurement data under transient operating conditions. The results indicate that both reduced-order prediction models achieved low mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) and high computational efficiency for reconstruction and prediction. With 12 sparse data points, the reconstruction error of two methods is comparable. Compared to the POD method, reduction coefficients of the AE method are more robust and have a uniform energy distribution, so AE exhibits superior noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Auto-Encoder as Reduced-Order Models for Reconstruction and Prediction of Turbine Blade Temperature Field With Sparse Data
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue7
    journal titleASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4068389
    journal fristpage73801-1
    journal lastpage73801-17
    page17
    treeASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer:;2025:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian