Show simple item record

contributor authorZhang, Yimin
contributor authorMi, Jin
contributor authorTong, Zi-Xiang
contributor authorQiu, Lu
contributor authorZhu, Jianqin
contributor authorLi, Dike
contributor authorCheng, Zeyuan
date accessioned2025-08-20T09:40:29Z
date available2025-08-20T09:40:29Z
date copyright5/6/2025 12:00:00 AM
date issued2025
identifier issn2832-8450
identifier otherht_147_07_073801.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308664
description abstractAccurately reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades is of significant importance in the field of aero-engines. The complexities in geometries and operation conditions of the blades further complicate these problems, because temperatures can only be acquired from sparse and noisy measurements. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and deep neural network auto-encoder (AE) are two typical reduced-order models to reconstruct the global temperature fields from sparse data points, and they are further combined with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for prediction. In contrast with the linear modes of POD, the nonlinear features of AE may lead to advantages in reconstructing and predicting of temperature fields. A systematic comparison between the two methods is seldom studied in existing research, particularly regarding their noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities. Therefore, a detailed study is conducted in this paper. The two-dimensional cross section of Mark II blades is used as an example; this work compares the performance of POD–LSTM and AE–LSTM in reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades based on sparse and noisy measurement data under transient operating conditions. The results indicate that both reduced-order prediction models achieved low mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) and high computational efficiency for reconstruction and prediction. With 12 sparse data points, the reconstruction error of two methods is comparable. Compared to the POD method, reduction coefficients of the AE method are more robust and have a uniform energy distribution, so AE exhibits superior noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Auto-Encoder as Reduced-Order Models for Reconstruction and Prediction of Turbine Blade Temperature Field With Sparse Data
typeJournal Paper
journal volume147
journal issue7
journal titleASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
identifier doi10.1115/1.4068389
journal fristpage73801-1
journal lastpage73801-17
page17
treeASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer:;2025:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record