YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impact of Production Strategy on Production Forecasting, Energy Demand, and Carbon Emissions: Typical Case Study of the Brazilian Presalt

    Source: Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture:;2025:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 003::page 31002-1
    Author:
    Hohendorff Filho, J. C. V.
    ,
    Bannwart, A. C.
    ,
    Estevam, V.
    ,
    Castro, M. S.
    ,
    Schiozer, D. J.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4067783
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This study evaluates how the production strategy influences the main decision-making indicators in the development of the production of a Brazilian presalt field, considering reservoir and production system models integrated into a single simulation. The general methodology involves the evaluation of alternative production strategies for a case study related to a production development project, from the point of view of reservoirs for the water injection recovery mechanism. Variables with a focus on the reservoir, production, and primary processing of fluids are included. Sensitivity analyses based on the methodology of the response surface of parameters and variables are performed in relation to oil recovery, financial return, energy demand, and carbon emission. Production and fluid injection curves are compared. The integrated modeling (reservoir, well, and processing) was important to evaluate the impact of the selection of the design and management variables of the integrated production strategy, showing the interdependence between the simulated models. The first-order analysis of the uncertain reservoir parameters observed a significant impact on the indicators of field recovery (up to 11%) and financial return (up to 13%), and a lower impact on energy demand (up to 7%), carbon emissions (up to 6%), and oil production per CO2 emitted (up to 4%). The design and management variables of the field (platform capacity, number of producer and injector wells, separation operating pressure, and maintenance pressure in the reservoir), including those related to the production system (platform process plant alternatives for gas recycling, gas turbine-driven compressors, primary separator operating pressure, and production control of the wells to limit CO2 emission) have a significant impact on the indicators of financial return (up to 10% without CO2 emission tax rate, up to 12% with emission tax rate), energy demand (up to 17%), carbon emissions (up to 15%), and oil production per CO2 emitted (up to 15%), with less impact on field recovery (up to 11%). The study quantifies the impact of production strategy variables in an integrated way, especially those related to the production system. This assessment is important for production forecasting and decision-making support on energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas production and processing.
    • Download: (1.057Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Impact of Production Strategy on Production Forecasting, Energy Demand, and Carbon Emissions: Typical Case Study of the Brazilian Presalt

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306388
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHohendorff Filho, J. C. V.
    contributor authorBannwart, A. C.
    contributor authorEstevam, V.
    contributor authorCastro, M. S.
    contributor authorSchiozer, D. J.
    date accessioned2025-04-21T10:31:59Z
    date available2025-04-21T10:31:59Z
    date copyright2/14/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier issn2998-1638
    identifier otherjertb-24-1023.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306388
    description abstractThis study evaluates how the production strategy influences the main decision-making indicators in the development of the production of a Brazilian presalt field, considering reservoir and production system models integrated into a single simulation. The general methodology involves the evaluation of alternative production strategies for a case study related to a production development project, from the point of view of reservoirs for the water injection recovery mechanism. Variables with a focus on the reservoir, production, and primary processing of fluids are included. Sensitivity analyses based on the methodology of the response surface of parameters and variables are performed in relation to oil recovery, financial return, energy demand, and carbon emission. Production and fluid injection curves are compared. The integrated modeling (reservoir, well, and processing) was important to evaluate the impact of the selection of the design and management variables of the integrated production strategy, showing the interdependence between the simulated models. The first-order analysis of the uncertain reservoir parameters observed a significant impact on the indicators of field recovery (up to 11%) and financial return (up to 13%), and a lower impact on energy demand (up to 7%), carbon emissions (up to 6%), and oil production per CO2 emitted (up to 4%). The design and management variables of the field (platform capacity, number of producer and injector wells, separation operating pressure, and maintenance pressure in the reservoir), including those related to the production system (platform process plant alternatives for gas recycling, gas turbine-driven compressors, primary separator operating pressure, and production control of the wells to limit CO2 emission) have a significant impact on the indicators of financial return (up to 10% without CO2 emission tax rate, up to 12% with emission tax rate), energy demand (up to 17%), carbon emissions (up to 15%), and oil production per CO2 emitted (up to 15%), with less impact on field recovery (up to 11%). The study quantifies the impact of production strategy variables in an integrated way, especially those related to the production system. This assessment is important for production forecasting and decision-making support on energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas production and processing.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleImpact of Production Strategy on Production Forecasting, Energy Demand, and Carbon Emissions: Typical Case Study of the Brazilian Presalt
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume1
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4067783
    journal fristpage31002-1
    journal lastpage31002-11
    page11
    treeJournal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture:;2025:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian