The Impact of Different Equilibrium Hypotheses on the Nonlinear Response of Bladed DisksSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2025:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 009::page 91002-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4067218Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Underplatform dampers (UPDs) are widely used in bladed disks to mitigate blades' vibration amplitude. Such devices introduce localized nonlinearities, whose modeling requires nonlinear solution techniques. When the harmonic balance method (HBM) is used to compute the nonlinear forced response of blades with UPDs, two different implementations are available: (i) the uncoupled approach, where the static equilibrium is determined in advance and used as input to determine the dynamic equilibrium; (ii) the coupled approach, where the static and dynamic equilibria are determined simultaneously. A common issue for both approaches is the variability in the static tangential contact forces, when the Coulomb friction model is used, that can result in multiple static equilibria and in multiple vibration levels. In this paper, the two approaches are used to determine the variability in the response levels of blades with UPDs and results are compared and discussed. Due to the large computation times associated with optimization algorithms implemented to compute the response limits, lumped parameter models are used; nevertheless, the main findings of the paper can be considered general. In particular, results show that the uncoupled approach systematically overestimates the uncertainty with respect to the coupled approach and that UPDs geometry affects the range of variability of the response.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Zara, Gianmarco | |
contributor author | Berruti, Teresa Maria | |
contributor author | Zucca, Stefano | |
date accessioned | 2025-04-21T10:18:14Z | |
date available | 2025-04-21T10:18:14Z | |
date copyright | 1/20/2025 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2025 | |
identifier issn | 0742-4795 | |
identifier other | gtp_147_09_091002.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305905 | |
description abstract | Underplatform dampers (UPDs) are widely used in bladed disks to mitigate blades' vibration amplitude. Such devices introduce localized nonlinearities, whose modeling requires nonlinear solution techniques. When the harmonic balance method (HBM) is used to compute the nonlinear forced response of blades with UPDs, two different implementations are available: (i) the uncoupled approach, where the static equilibrium is determined in advance and used as input to determine the dynamic equilibrium; (ii) the coupled approach, where the static and dynamic equilibria are determined simultaneously. A common issue for both approaches is the variability in the static tangential contact forces, when the Coulomb friction model is used, that can result in multiple static equilibria and in multiple vibration levels. In this paper, the two approaches are used to determine the variability in the response levels of blades with UPDs and results are compared and discussed. Due to the large computation times associated with optimization algorithms implemented to compute the response limits, lumped parameter models are used; nevertheless, the main findings of the paper can be considered general. In particular, results show that the uncoupled approach systematically overestimates the uncertainty with respect to the coupled approach and that UPDs geometry affects the range of variability of the response. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | The Impact of Different Equilibrium Hypotheses on the Nonlinear Response of Bladed Disks | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 147 | |
journal issue | 9 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4067218 | |
journal fristpage | 91002-1 | |
journal lastpage | 91002-9 | |
page | 9 | |
tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2025:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 009 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |