Design-Point Techno-Economics of Brayton Cycle PTES for Combined Heat and PowerSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 002::page 21008-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4066256Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Pumped thermal energy storage (PTES) systems are grid batteries that use heat pumps to create both hot and cold thermal energy stores when there is excess electricity and then use a power cycle to convert the thermal energy into electricity when there is demand for electricity. In normal operation, Joule–Brayton PTES discharges low-grade heat at temperatures useful for thermal energy consumers like district and industrial heating. Furthermore, PTES designs, like conventional combined heat and power (CHP) technology, can be modified to sacrifice some round-trip efficiency (RTE) to increase the temperature of heat rejection. This paper uses design-point performance and cost models that provide a detailed understanding of the efficiency and cost tradeoffs of rejecting heat at various temperatures in ideal-gas Brayton PTES configurations. First, we keep the heat rejection in its nominal location in the PTES system: in the discharge cycle after the low-pressure exit of the recuperator before the cold-storage heat exchanger. Next, we move the heat rejection to the discharge turbine exit. We define design-point metrics that isolate both the cost and performance penalty associated with the hotter heat rejection and attribute it exclusively to the heat economic metrics. Finally, we estimate the performance of electric heater technology to generate heat at equivalent temperatures. We find that the levelized cost of heat (LCOH), including the cost of thermal energy storage (TES) buffering the PTES and heat off-taker, compares favorably versus electric technologies and is less than the cost of natural gas for low temperature scenarios and competitive with the cost of natural gas in some regions of the contiguous U.S. in high temperature scenarios.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Neises, Ty | |
| contributor author | McTigue, Joshua | |
| date accessioned | 2025-04-21T10:17:11Z | |
| date available | 2025-04-21T10:17:11Z | |
| date copyright | 9/26/2024 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2024 | |
| identifier issn | 0742-4795 | |
| identifier other | gtp_147_02_021008.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305871 | |
| description abstract | Pumped thermal energy storage (PTES) systems are grid batteries that use heat pumps to create both hot and cold thermal energy stores when there is excess electricity and then use a power cycle to convert the thermal energy into electricity when there is demand for electricity. In normal operation, Joule–Brayton PTES discharges low-grade heat at temperatures useful for thermal energy consumers like district and industrial heating. Furthermore, PTES designs, like conventional combined heat and power (CHP) technology, can be modified to sacrifice some round-trip efficiency (RTE) to increase the temperature of heat rejection. This paper uses design-point performance and cost models that provide a detailed understanding of the efficiency and cost tradeoffs of rejecting heat at various temperatures in ideal-gas Brayton PTES configurations. First, we keep the heat rejection in its nominal location in the PTES system: in the discharge cycle after the low-pressure exit of the recuperator before the cold-storage heat exchanger. Next, we move the heat rejection to the discharge turbine exit. We define design-point metrics that isolate both the cost and performance penalty associated with the hotter heat rejection and attribute it exclusively to the heat economic metrics. Finally, we estimate the performance of electric heater technology to generate heat at equivalent temperatures. We find that the levelized cost of heat (LCOH), including the cost of thermal energy storage (TES) buffering the PTES and heat off-taker, compares favorably versus electric technologies and is less than the cost of natural gas for low temperature scenarios and competitive with the cost of natural gas in some regions of the contiguous U.S. in high temperature scenarios. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Design-Point Techno-Economics of Brayton Cycle PTES for Combined Heat and Power | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 147 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4066256 | |
| journal fristpage | 21008-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 21008-9 | |
| page | 9 | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |