YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Experimental Validation of a Predictive Control Co-Design Algorithm

    Source: ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control:;2025:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 003::page 31001-1
    Author:
    Nash, Austin L.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4067654
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Control co-design (CCD) represents a promising solution for coordinating the physical design and control of dynamic engineering systems as technological demands become more stringent. Predictive control co-design (pCCD), recently introduced to the CCD literature, optimizes combinations of feedforward and feedback static gain sets at the system design stage to combine the robustness and preview control afforded using state-of-the-art control methods, like model predictive control (MPC), in CCD with the computational efficiency of open-loop CCD methods that solve CCD problems with a single optimization level. This work contributes the first experimental validation of pCCD to the literature. First, pCCD is performed offline on a spring-mass-damper system. The co-designed system’s optimal response is then experimentally validated online. Results are compared to an analogous system co-designed with an open-loop CCD method. The experimental system co-designed using pCCD yielded a sum squared error with respect to a desired reference signal 40 times smaller than the system co-designed using open-loop CCD. The results indicate that pCCD yields co-designed systems with superior online robustness in comparison to open-loop CCD methods. Moreover, systems co-designed using pCCD are more robust to both modeling error and unexpected disturbance inputs or changes in desired reference signals encountered online.
    • Download: (1.529Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Experimental Validation of a Predictive Control Co-Design Algorithm

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305836
    Collections
    • ASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNash, Austin L.
    date accessioned2025-04-21T10:16:07Z
    date available2025-04-21T10:16:07Z
    date copyright2/17/2025 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2025
    identifier issn2689-6117
    identifier otheraldsc-24-1043.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305836
    description abstractControl co-design (CCD) represents a promising solution for coordinating the physical design and control of dynamic engineering systems as technological demands become more stringent. Predictive control co-design (pCCD), recently introduced to the CCD literature, optimizes combinations of feedforward and feedback static gain sets at the system design stage to combine the robustness and preview control afforded using state-of-the-art control methods, like model predictive control (MPC), in CCD with the computational efficiency of open-loop CCD methods that solve CCD problems with a single optimization level. This work contributes the first experimental validation of pCCD to the literature. First, pCCD is performed offline on a spring-mass-damper system. The co-designed system’s optimal response is then experimentally validated online. Results are compared to an analogous system co-designed with an open-loop CCD method. The experimental system co-designed using pCCD yielded a sum squared error with respect to a desired reference signal 40 times smaller than the system co-designed using open-loop CCD. The results indicate that pCCD yields co-designed systems with superior online robustness in comparison to open-loop CCD methods. Moreover, systems co-designed using pCCD are more robust to both modeling error and unexpected disturbance inputs or changes in desired reference signals encountered online.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleExperimental Validation of a Predictive Control Co-Design Algorithm
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue3
    journal titleASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4067654
    journal fristpage31001-1
    journal lastpage31001-9
    page9
    treeASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control:;2025:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian