YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Low Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock

    Source: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 001::page 11007-1
    Author:
    Parupudi, Ranga Vihari
    ,
    Redpath, David
    ,
    Singh, Harjit
    ,
    Jalali, Mohammad Reza
    ,
    Kolokotroni, Maria
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4065980
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The most appropriate low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) technology suitable for European buildings located in mid-high latitudes under both maritime and continental climatic conditions has been identified as the asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator (ACPC). To date, there is no published experimental data at different latitudes on the long-term performance of these systems at these latitudes nor how location would modify the optical characteristics of deployed systems. Previous theoretical research by the authors has demonstrated the superiority of the ACPC with this additional work experimentally confirming the robustness of the design. To investigate how seasonal and locational variations affect their measured technical performance two identical ACPC-LCPVs were installed, instrumented, and monitored at two different climatic locations (Uxbridge, UK, and Vevey, Switzerland) from May 2020 to September 2020. A valid comparative performance investigation characterizing two geometrically equivalent ACPC-based LCPV systems using real-life experimental data collected is presented in this paper. Locations at higher latitudes experience greater transverse angles more frequently compared to locations nearer the equator making ACPC geometries more appropriate than symmetrical concentrator configurations for building retrofit. This is shown in this paper over a latitudinal expanse of 31.35 deg for four separate locations; Tessalit (20.19 deg N, 1.00 deg E; Mali), Timimoun (28.03 deg N, 1.65 deg E; Algeria), Uxbridge (51.54 deg N, 0.48 deg E, UK), and Vevey (46.6 deg N, 6.84 deg E, Switzerland).
    • Download: (995.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Low Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305819
    Collections
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorParupudi, Ranga Vihari
    contributor authorRedpath, David
    contributor authorSingh, Harjit
    contributor authorJalali, Mohammad Reza
    contributor authorKolokotroni, Maria
    date accessioned2025-04-21T10:15:37Z
    date available2025-04-21T10:15:37Z
    date copyright8/7/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier issn0199-6231
    identifier othersol_147_1_011007.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305819
    description abstractThe most appropriate low concentrating photovoltaic (LCPV) technology suitable for European buildings located in mid-high latitudes under both maritime and continental climatic conditions has been identified as the asymmetric compound parabolic concentrator (ACPC). To date, there is no published experimental data at different latitudes on the long-term performance of these systems at these latitudes nor how location would modify the optical characteristics of deployed systems. Previous theoretical research by the authors has demonstrated the superiority of the ACPC with this additional work experimentally confirming the robustness of the design. To investigate how seasonal and locational variations affect their measured technical performance two identical ACPC-LCPVs were installed, instrumented, and monitored at two different climatic locations (Uxbridge, UK, and Vevey, Switzerland) from May 2020 to September 2020. A valid comparative performance investigation characterizing two geometrically equivalent ACPC-based LCPV systems using real-life experimental data collected is presented in this paper. Locations at higher latitudes experience greater transverse angles more frequently compared to locations nearer the equator making ACPC geometries more appropriate than symmetrical concentrator configurations for building retrofit. This is shown in this paper over a latitudinal expanse of 31.35 deg for four separate locations; Tessalit (20.19 deg N, 1.00 deg E; Mali), Timimoun (28.03 deg N, 1.65 deg E; Algeria), Uxbridge (51.54 deg N, 0.48 deg E, UK), and Vevey (46.6 deg N, 6.84 deg E, Switzerland).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLow Concentrating Photovoltaic Geometry for Retrofitting Onto European Building Stock
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4065980
    journal fristpage11007-1
    journal lastpage11007-8
    page8
    treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian