Effect of Reduced Oil Flow Rate on the Performance of a Load on Pad Journal Bearing: Flooded Versus Evacuated ConditionsSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2023:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 004::page 41004-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4063686Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Means to decrease the energy consumption of tilting pad journal bearings (TPJBs) without affecting their performance and structural integrity are mandatory in a cost efficient operation. Reducing the lubricant flow supplied to a bearing is a distinct method to diminish drag power losses along with savings in oil storage and pump equipment. However, a too low flow remains questionable in industrial practice. Starved flow conditions produce hot pad surfaces that could lead to Babbitt failure; and under certain loads, generate subsynchronous vibrations (SSV). This paper aims to resolve some of the issues above via measurements of the load performance conducted with a four-pad TPJB configured as load-on-pad (LOP) and having its ends sealed or open to make flooded and evacuated conditions. Prior measurements were conducted with the same bearing under load-between-pads (LBP); see Refs. [1] and [2]. The nominal supplied flow (Q) of ISO VG 46 oil at 60 °C is proportional to shaft speed (max. 12 krpm: 62.8 m/s surface speed). In the tests, the flow Qs ranges from 1.5 Q to just ¼ Q, and the applied units load reaches 2.07 MPa. Compared to the flooded bearing, the evacuated bearing produces a slightly larger eccentricity across the range of flow rates. For a unit load = 2.07 MPa and shaft speed of 6 or 12 krpm, the highest pad subsurface temperature reaches ∼130 °C for Qs below 50% nominal. For both bearings, flooded or evacuated, drag power losses decrease to ∼30% as the oil flow drops from 100% to 50% Q. As the oil flow increases to 1.5 Q, the drag power increases ∼10% for both bearing types at 6 krpm and for the flooded one at 12 krpm, while the evacuated bearing shows a reduction of ∼7%. The drag power grows as the static load increases; the evacuated bearing producing up to ∼ 40% lesser power loss than the flooded bearing. Both bearings produce similar size direct stiffnesses though largely orthotropic, Kyy ≫ Kxx. Direct damping coefficients Cxx ∼ Cyy increase with shaft speed and unit load but dramatically decrease as Qs drops, in particular for the evacuated bearing. The current measurements and those in Refs. [1] and [2] demonstrate that LOP and LBP bearings can safely operate with 50% of nominal flow thus saving drag power, and without too large pad, temperature rises. Alas, too low Qs produces a significant reduction in the damping coefficient orthogonal to the applied load direction. The effect is most evident in the LOP evacuated bearing, which is most prone to show SSV Hash.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Andrés, Luis San | |
| contributor author | Ouyang, Zihan | |
| contributor author | Qin, Yudi | |
| date accessioned | 2024-04-24T22:25:46Z | |
| date available | 2024-04-24T22:25:46Z | |
| date copyright | 12/6/2023 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2023 | |
| identifier issn | 0742-4795 | |
| identifier other | gtp_146_04_041004.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295201 | |
| description abstract | Means to decrease the energy consumption of tilting pad journal bearings (TPJBs) without affecting their performance and structural integrity are mandatory in a cost efficient operation. Reducing the lubricant flow supplied to a bearing is a distinct method to diminish drag power losses along with savings in oil storage and pump equipment. However, a too low flow remains questionable in industrial practice. Starved flow conditions produce hot pad surfaces that could lead to Babbitt failure; and under certain loads, generate subsynchronous vibrations (SSV). This paper aims to resolve some of the issues above via measurements of the load performance conducted with a four-pad TPJB configured as load-on-pad (LOP) and having its ends sealed or open to make flooded and evacuated conditions. Prior measurements were conducted with the same bearing under load-between-pads (LBP); see Refs. [1] and [2]. The nominal supplied flow (Q) of ISO VG 46 oil at 60 °C is proportional to shaft speed (max. 12 krpm: 62.8 m/s surface speed). In the tests, the flow Qs ranges from 1.5 Q to just ¼ Q, and the applied units load reaches 2.07 MPa. Compared to the flooded bearing, the evacuated bearing produces a slightly larger eccentricity across the range of flow rates. For a unit load = 2.07 MPa and shaft speed of 6 or 12 krpm, the highest pad subsurface temperature reaches ∼130 °C for Qs below 50% nominal. For both bearings, flooded or evacuated, drag power losses decrease to ∼30% as the oil flow drops from 100% to 50% Q. As the oil flow increases to 1.5 Q, the drag power increases ∼10% for both bearing types at 6 krpm and for the flooded one at 12 krpm, while the evacuated bearing shows a reduction of ∼7%. The drag power grows as the static load increases; the evacuated bearing producing up to ∼ 40% lesser power loss than the flooded bearing. Both bearings produce similar size direct stiffnesses though largely orthotropic, Kyy ≫ Kxx. Direct damping coefficients Cxx ∼ Cyy increase with shaft speed and unit load but dramatically decrease as Qs drops, in particular for the evacuated bearing. The current measurements and those in Refs. [1] and [2] demonstrate that LOP and LBP bearings can safely operate with 50% of nominal flow thus saving drag power, and without too large pad, temperature rises. Alas, too low Qs produces a significant reduction in the damping coefficient orthogonal to the applied load direction. The effect is most evident in the LOP evacuated bearing, which is most prone to show SSV Hash. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Effect of Reduced Oil Flow Rate on the Performance of a Load on Pad Journal Bearing: Flooded Versus Evacuated Conditions | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 146 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4063686 | |
| journal fristpage | 41004-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 41004-12 | |
| page | 12 | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2023:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |