The Mechanical Characterization and Comparison of Male and Female Calvaria Under Four-Point Bending ImpactsSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 005::page 51009-1Author:Adanty, Kevin
,
Bhagavathula, Kapil B.
,
Tronchin, Olivia
,
Li, David X.
,
Rabey, Karyne N.
,
Doschak, Michael R.
,
Adeeb, Samer
,
Hogan, James
,
Ouellet, Simon
,
Plaisted, Thomas A.
,
Satapathy, Sikhanda S.
,
Romanyk, Dan L.
,
Dennison, Christopher R.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4056459Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: The circumstances in which we mechanically test and critically assess human calvarium tissue would find relevance under conditions encompassing real-world head impacts. These conditions include, among other variables, impact velocities, and strain rates. Compared to quasi-static loading on calvaria, there is less reporting on the impact loading of the calvaria and consequently, there are relatively fewer mechanical properties on calvaria at relevant impact loading rates available in the literature. The purpose of this work was to report on the mechanical response of 23 human calvarium specimens subjected to dynamic four-point bending impacts. Impacts were performed using a custom-built four-point impact apparatus at impact velocities of 0.86–0.89 m/s resulting in surface strain rates of 2–3/s—representative of strain rates observed in vehicle collisions and blunt impacts. The study revealed comparable effective bending moduli (11–15 GPa) to the limited work reported on the impact mechanics of calvaria in the literature, however, fracture bending stress (10–47 MPa) was relatively less. As expected, surface strains at fracture (0.21–0.25%) were less compared to studies that performed quasi-static bending. Moreover, the study revealed no significant differences in mechanical response between male and female calvaria. The findings presented in this work are relevant to many areas including validating surrogate skull fracture models in silico or laboratory during impact and optimizing protective devices used by civilians to reduce the risk of a serious head injury.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Adanty, Kevin | |
contributor author | Bhagavathula, Kapil B. | |
contributor author | Tronchin, Olivia | |
contributor author | Li, David X. | |
contributor author | Rabey, Karyne N. | |
contributor author | Doschak, Michael R. | |
contributor author | Adeeb, Samer | |
contributor author | Hogan, James | |
contributor author | Ouellet, Simon | |
contributor author | Plaisted, Thomas A. | |
contributor author | Satapathy, Sikhanda S. | |
contributor author | Romanyk, Dan L. | |
contributor author | Dennison, Christopher R. | |
date accessioned | 2023-08-16T18:43:37Z | |
date available | 2023-08-16T18:43:37Z | |
date copyright | 2/3/2023 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2023 | |
identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
identifier other | bio_145_05_051009.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292389 | |
description abstract | The circumstances in which we mechanically test and critically assess human calvarium tissue would find relevance under conditions encompassing real-world head impacts. These conditions include, among other variables, impact velocities, and strain rates. Compared to quasi-static loading on calvaria, there is less reporting on the impact loading of the calvaria and consequently, there are relatively fewer mechanical properties on calvaria at relevant impact loading rates available in the literature. The purpose of this work was to report on the mechanical response of 23 human calvarium specimens subjected to dynamic four-point bending impacts. Impacts were performed using a custom-built four-point impact apparatus at impact velocities of 0.86–0.89 m/s resulting in surface strain rates of 2–3/s—representative of strain rates observed in vehicle collisions and blunt impacts. The study revealed comparable effective bending moduli (11–15 GPa) to the limited work reported on the impact mechanics of calvaria in the literature, however, fracture bending stress (10–47 MPa) was relatively less. As expected, surface strains at fracture (0.21–0.25%) were less compared to studies that performed quasi-static bending. Moreover, the study revealed no significant differences in mechanical response between male and female calvaria. The findings presented in this work are relevant to many areas including validating surrogate skull fracture models in silico or laboratory during impact and optimizing protective devices used by civilians to reduce the risk of a serious head injury. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | The Mechanical Characterization and Comparison of Male and Female Calvaria Under Four-Point Bending Impacts | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 145 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4056459 | |
journal fristpage | 51009-1 | |
journal lastpage | 51009-12 | |
page | 12 | |
tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |