Show simple item record

contributor authorAdanty, Kevin
contributor authorBhagavathula, Kapil B.
contributor authorTronchin, Olivia
contributor authorLi, David X.
contributor authorRabey, Karyne N.
contributor authorDoschak, Michael R.
contributor authorAdeeb, Samer
contributor authorHogan, James
contributor authorOuellet, Simon
contributor authorPlaisted, Thomas A.
contributor authorSatapathy, Sikhanda S.
contributor authorRomanyk, Dan L.
contributor authorDennison, Christopher R.
date accessioned2023-08-16T18:43:37Z
date available2023-08-16T18:43:37Z
date copyright2/3/2023 12:00:00 AM
date issued2023
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_145_05_051009.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4292389
description abstractThe circumstances in which we mechanically test and critically assess human calvarium tissue would find relevance under conditions encompassing real-world head impacts. These conditions include, among other variables, impact velocities, and strain rates. Compared to quasi-static loading on calvaria, there is less reporting on the impact loading of the calvaria and consequently, there are relatively fewer mechanical properties on calvaria at relevant impact loading rates available in the literature. The purpose of this work was to report on the mechanical response of 23 human calvarium specimens subjected to dynamic four-point bending impacts. Impacts were performed using a custom-built four-point impact apparatus at impact velocities of 0.86–0.89 m/s resulting in surface strain rates of 2–3/s—representative of strain rates observed in vehicle collisions and blunt impacts. The study revealed comparable effective bending moduli (11–15 GPa) to the limited work reported on the impact mechanics of calvaria in the literature, however, fracture bending stress (10–47 MPa) was relatively less. As expected, surface strains at fracture (0.21–0.25%) were less compared to studies that performed quasi-static bending. Moreover, the study revealed no significant differences in mechanical response between male and female calvaria. The findings presented in this work are relevant to many areas including validating surrogate skull fracture models in silico or laboratory during impact and optimizing protective devices used by civilians to reduce the risk of a serious head injury.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleThe Mechanical Characterization and Comparison of Male and Female Calvaria Under Four-Point Bending Impacts
typeJournal Paper
journal volume145
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4056459
journal fristpage51009-1
journal lastpage51009-12
page12
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2023:;volume( 145 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record