Numerical Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Three Boil-Off Gas Reliquefaction SystemsSource: Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2022:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 008::page 81017-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4054283Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In view of the problem that the boil-off gas (BOG) generated by small liquefied natural gas (LNG) ships affects the transportation safety, three BOG reliquefaction systems are improved, which are as follows: case 1: serial nitrogen expansion reliquefaction system (N2-BOG); case 2: single mixed refrigerant reliquefaction system (SMR-BOG); and case 3: propane precooled mixed refrigerant reliquefaction system (C3MR-BOG). The basic process is simulated in aspen plus and combined with the mathematical model built up in matlab where the three cycles are optimized with the specific power consumption (SPC) as the objective function. The results show that the SPC of three cases are 0.8021 kWh/kg (LNG), 0.4150 kWh/kg (LNG), and 0.5063 kWh/kg (LNG); the coefficient of performance (COP) of cases 1, 2, and 3 are 0.20, 0.39, and 0.30; the exergy efficiency of 36.56%, 70.66%, and 57.93% along with the total product cost of 89.00 $/h, 55.73 $/h, and 77.54 $/h are achieved in Cases 1–3, respectively. In addition, the overall exergy destruction of the cycles and each equipment are discussed, and the matching of the cold and heat sources of the multistream heat exchanger in the three systems is analyzed. In conclusion, under the condition that the BOG mass flowrate is 350 kg/h, the improved SMR-BOG has advantages on thermodynamic performance and economic analysis, which makes it a better choice.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Yan | |
contributor author | Mingyue;Pan | |
contributor author | Zhen;Shang | |
contributor author | Liyan;Zhou | |
contributor author | Li;Yu | |
contributor author | Jingxian | |
date accessioned | 2022-08-18T12:50:23Z | |
date available | 2022-08-18T12:50:23Z | |
date copyright | 5/12/2022 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2022 | |
identifier issn | 1948-5085 | |
identifier other | tsea_14_8_081017.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286951 | |
description abstract | In view of the problem that the boil-off gas (BOG) generated by small liquefied natural gas (LNG) ships affects the transportation safety, three BOG reliquefaction systems are improved, which are as follows: case 1: serial nitrogen expansion reliquefaction system (N2-BOG); case 2: single mixed refrigerant reliquefaction system (SMR-BOG); and case 3: propane precooled mixed refrigerant reliquefaction system (C3MR-BOG). The basic process is simulated in aspen plus and combined with the mathematical model built up in matlab where the three cycles are optimized with the specific power consumption (SPC) as the objective function. The results show that the SPC of three cases are 0.8021 kWh/kg (LNG), 0.4150 kWh/kg (LNG), and 0.5063 kWh/kg (LNG); the coefficient of performance (COP) of cases 1, 2, and 3 are 0.20, 0.39, and 0.30; the exergy efficiency of 36.56%, 70.66%, and 57.93% along with the total product cost of 89.00 $/h, 55.73 $/h, and 77.54 $/h are achieved in Cases 1–3, respectively. In addition, the overall exergy destruction of the cycles and each equipment are discussed, and the matching of the cold and heat sources of the multistream heat exchanger in the three systems is analyzed. In conclusion, under the condition that the BOG mass flowrate is 350 kg/h, the improved SMR-BOG has advantages on thermodynamic performance and economic analysis, which makes it a better choice. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Numerical Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Three Boil-Off Gas Reliquefaction Systems | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 14 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4054283 | |
journal fristpage | 81017-1 | |
journal lastpage | 81017-10 | |
page | 10 | |
tree | Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2022:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |