Modeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, Large Eddy Simulation, and Direct Numerical SimulationSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006::page 61106-1DOI: 10.1115/1.4053611Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large eddy simulation (LES), the ability of sublayer-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the d-type roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case: a low Reynolds number k–ϵ model, the Menter k–ω SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Altland, Samuel | |
contributor author | Xu, Haosen H. A. | |
contributor author | Yang, Xiang I. A. | |
contributor author | Kunz, Robert | |
date accessioned | 2022-05-08T09:11:08Z | |
date available | 2022-05-08T09:11:08Z | |
date copyright | 2/16/2022 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2022 | |
identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
identifier other | fe_144_06_061106.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284828 | |
description abstract | Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large eddy simulation (LES), the ability of sublayer-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the d-type roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case: a low Reynolds number k–ϵ model, the Menter k–ω SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Modeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, Large Eddy Simulation, and Direct Numerical Simulation | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 144 | |
journal issue | 6 | |
journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4053611 | |
journal fristpage | 61106-1 | |
journal lastpage | 61106-9 | |
page | 9 | |
tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |