YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Modeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, Large Eddy Simulation, and Direct Numerical Simulation

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006::page 61106-1
    Author:
    Altland, Samuel
    ,
    Xu, Haosen H. A.
    ,
    Yang, Xiang I. A.
    ,
    Kunz, Robert
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4053611
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large eddy simulation (LES), the ability of sublayer-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the d-type roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case: a low Reynolds number k–ϵ model, the Menter k–ω SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.
    • Download: (2.455Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Modeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, Large Eddy Simulation, and Direct Numerical Simulation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284828
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAltland, Samuel
    contributor authorXu, Haosen H. A.
    contributor authorYang, Xiang I. A.
    contributor authorKunz, Robert
    date accessioned2022-05-08T09:11:08Z
    date available2022-05-08T09:11:08Z
    date copyright2/16/2022 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2022
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_144_06_061106.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4284828
    description abstractFlow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large eddy simulation (LES), the ability of sublayer-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the d-type roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case: a low Reynolds number k–ϵ model, the Menter k–ω SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleModeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, Large Eddy Simulation, and Direct Numerical Simulation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4053611
    journal fristpage61106-1
    journal lastpage61106-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2022:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian