YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Uncertainty Estimation of Biomedical Oximeters: Proposal for an Experimental Test-Bench

    Source: Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003::page 1028-1
    Author:
    Marchionni, Paolo
    ,
    Nobile, Stefano
    ,
    Carnielli, Virgilio P.
    ,
    Scalise, Lorenzo
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4050721
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Paramagnetic oximeters are frequently used in clinical practice to measure and titrate the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) administered to a hypoxic patient. Newborns are prone to several diseases leading to hypoxia but also to oxidative damage, therefore a precise measurement of administered oxygen is of paramount importance. In this study, we evaluated and compared the performance of four commonly used gas analyzers at a Neonatal Unit. A paramagnetic gas analyzer was considered the standard for reference. Gas mixing performed by blenders was also evaluated. We first assessed the stability and composition of O2 and medical air. A settling time study was conducted to estimate a steady-state. Results show how tested blenders underestimated the real measures when FiO2 was <50% and overestimated them when FiO2 ≥50%. In all the tested oximeters the FiO2 was underestimated by 1.18%, but the overall agreement with the gold standard was very good.
    • Download: (1.214Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Uncertainty Estimation of Biomedical Oximeters: Proposal for an Experimental Test-Bench

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277108
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMarchionni, Paolo
    contributor authorNobile, Stefano
    contributor authorCarnielli, Virgilio P.
    contributor authorScalise, Lorenzo
    date accessioned2022-02-05T22:11:58Z
    date available2022-02-05T22:11:58Z
    date copyright5/6/2021 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2021
    identifier issn2377-2158
    identifier othervvuq-20-1028.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277108
    description abstractParamagnetic oximeters are frequently used in clinical practice to measure and titrate the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) administered to a hypoxic patient. Newborns are prone to several diseases leading to hypoxia but also to oxidative damage, therefore a precise measurement of administered oxygen is of paramount importance. In this study, we evaluated and compared the performance of four commonly used gas analyzers at a Neonatal Unit. A paramagnetic gas analyzer was considered the standard for reference. Gas mixing performed by blenders was also evaluated. We first assessed the stability and composition of O2 and medical air. A settling time study was conducted to estimate a steady-state. Results show how tested blenders underestimated the real measures when FiO2 was <50% and overestimated them when FiO2 ≥50%. In all the tested oximeters the FiO2 was underestimated by 1.18%, but the overall agreement with the gold standard was very good.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleUncertainty Estimation of Biomedical Oximeters: Proposal for an Experimental Test-Bench
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4050721
    journal fristpage1028-1
    journal lastpage1028-24
    page24
    treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian