Show simple item record

contributor authorMarchionni, Paolo
contributor authorNobile, Stefano
contributor authorCarnielli, Virgilio P.
contributor authorScalise, Lorenzo
date accessioned2022-02-05T22:11:58Z
date available2022-02-05T22:11:58Z
date copyright5/6/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn2377-2158
identifier othervvuq-20-1028.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4277108
description abstractParamagnetic oximeters are frequently used in clinical practice to measure and titrate the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) administered to a hypoxic patient. Newborns are prone to several diseases leading to hypoxia but also to oxidative damage, therefore a precise measurement of administered oxygen is of paramount importance. In this study, we evaluated and compared the performance of four commonly used gas analyzers at a Neonatal Unit. A paramagnetic gas analyzer was considered the standard for reference. Gas mixing performed by blenders was also evaluated. We first assessed the stability and composition of O2 and medical air. A settling time study was conducted to estimate a steady-state. Results show how tested blenders underestimated the real measures when FiO2 was <50% and overestimated them when FiO2 ≥50%. In all the tested oximeters the FiO2 was underestimated by 1.18%, but the overall agreement with the gold standard was very good.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleUncertainty Estimation of Biomedical Oximeters: Proposal for an Experimental Test-Bench
typeJournal Paper
journal volume6
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
identifier doi10.1115/1.4050721
journal fristpage1028-1
journal lastpage1028-24
page24
treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record