YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Interpolation and Extrapolation of Flame Describing Functions

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 006::page 061009-1
    Author:
    McCartney, Michael
    ,
    Haeringer, Matthias
    ,
    Polifke, Wolfgang
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4045516
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This paper examines and compares the commonly used machine learning algorithms in their performance in interpolation and extrapolation of flame describing function (FDFs), based on experimental and simulation data. Algorithm performance is evaluated by interpolating and extrapolating FDFs and then the impact of errors on the limit cycle amplitudes are evaluated using the extended FDF (xFDF) framework. The best algorithms in interpolation and extrapolation were found to be the widely used cubic spline interpolation, as well as the Gaussian processes (GPs) regressor. The data itself were found to be an important factor in defining the predictive performance of a model; therefore, a method of optimally selecting data points at test time using Gaussian processes was demonstrated. The aim of this is to allow a minimal amount of data points to be collected while still providing enough information to model the FDF accurately. The extrapolation performance was shown to decay very quickly with distance from the domain and so emphasis should be put on selecting measurement points in order to expand the covered domain. Gaussian processes also give an indication of confidence on its predictions and are used to carry out uncertainty quantification, in order to understand model sensitivities. This was demonstrated through application to the xFDF framework.
    • Download: (1.320Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Interpolation and Extrapolation of Flame Describing Functions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274662
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMcCartney, Michael
    contributor authorHaeringer, Matthias
    contributor authorPolifke, Wolfgang
    date accessioned2022-02-04T21:59:28Z
    date available2022-02-04T21:59:28Z
    date copyright5/29/2020 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2020
    identifier issn0742-4795
    identifier othergtp_142_06_061009.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274662
    description abstractThis paper examines and compares the commonly used machine learning algorithms in their performance in interpolation and extrapolation of flame describing function (FDFs), based on experimental and simulation data. Algorithm performance is evaluated by interpolating and extrapolating FDFs and then the impact of errors on the limit cycle amplitudes are evaluated using the extended FDF (xFDF) framework. The best algorithms in interpolation and extrapolation were found to be the widely used cubic spline interpolation, as well as the Gaussian processes (GPs) regressor. The data itself were found to be an important factor in defining the predictive performance of a model; therefore, a method of optimally selecting data points at test time using Gaussian processes was demonstrated. The aim of this is to allow a minimal amount of data points to be collected while still providing enough information to model the FDF accurately. The extrapolation performance was shown to decay very quickly with distance from the domain and so emphasis should be put on selecting measurement points in order to expand the covered domain. Gaussian processes also give an indication of confidence on its predictions and are used to carry out uncertainty quantification, in order to understand model sensitivities. This was demonstrated through application to the xFDF framework.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleComparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Interpolation and Extrapolation of Flame Describing Functions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4045516
    journal fristpage061009-1
    journal lastpage061009-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian