Cycle Optimization Potential of Composite Cycle and Turbocompound Aero-Engines

Abstract

Fair comparison of future aircraft engine concepts requires the assumption of similar technological risk and a transparent book keeping of losses. A 1000 km and a 7000 km flight mission of a single-aisle airplane similar to the Aribus A321neo LR have been used to compare composite cycle engines, turbocompound engines and advanced gas turbines as potential options for an entry-into-service time frame of 2050+. A 2035 technology gas turbine serves as reference. The cycle optimization has been carried out with a peak pressure ratio of 250 and a maximum cycle temperature of 2200 K at cruise as boundary conditions. With the associated heat loss and the low efficiency of the gas exchange process limiting piston component efficiency, the cycle optimization filtered out composite cycle concepts. Taking mission fuel burn (MFB) as the most relevant criterion, the highest MFB reduction of 13.7% compared to the 2035 reference gas turbine is demonstrated for an air-cooled turbocompound concept with additional combustion chamber. An intercooled, hectopressure gas turbine with pressure gain combustion achieves 20.6% reduction in MFB relative to the 2035 reference gas turbine.