YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance Comparison of Enthalpy Recovery Devices Using Liquid Desiccant and Desiccant Wheel

    Source: Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2020:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Zhang, Tao
    ,
    Liu, Xiaohua
    ,
    Xie, Ying
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4046063
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Heat recovery between outdoor air and indoor exhaust air is an effective approach for energy-saving in the air-conditioning system. Performances of enthalpy recovery devices using liquid desiccant (LD) and desiccant wheel (DW) are compared in the present study. Effects of key factors including desiccant flow rate, number of transfer units (NTUm), and air inlet parameters on recovery performance are analyzed. There exists the same ideal recovery efficiency with a given NTUm for these two kinds of devices. However, an optimal solution flow rate could be achieved for enthalpy recovery device using LD, while a higher rotation speed leads to a higher recovery efficiency for that using DW. Recovery efficiencies of the two devices increase with the increase in NTUm, while they have different ranges of NTUm. NTUm of the DW is usually superior to that of the LD, due to the material difference. Then, the optimum methods to improve recovery efficiency of the two devices are clarified, i.e., increasing NTUm for an enthalpy recovery device using LD and choosing a reasonable rotation speed for that using DW, respectively. The present research will be beneficial to cast light on the relation between enthalpy recovery devices using LD and DW.
    • Download: (2.059Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance Comparison of Enthalpy Recovery Devices Using Liquid Desiccant and Desiccant Wheel

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274349
    Collections
    • Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhang, Tao
    contributor authorLiu, Xiaohua
    contributor authorXie, Ying
    date accessioned2022-02-04T14:46:40Z
    date available2022-02-04T14:46:40Z
    date copyright2020/02/26/
    date issued2020
    identifier issn1948-5085
    identifier othertsea_12_5_051004.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4274349
    description abstractHeat recovery between outdoor air and indoor exhaust air is an effective approach for energy-saving in the air-conditioning system. Performances of enthalpy recovery devices using liquid desiccant (LD) and desiccant wheel (DW) are compared in the present study. Effects of key factors including desiccant flow rate, number of transfer units (NTUm), and air inlet parameters on recovery performance are analyzed. There exists the same ideal recovery efficiency with a given NTUm for these two kinds of devices. However, an optimal solution flow rate could be achieved for enthalpy recovery device using LD, while a higher rotation speed leads to a higher recovery efficiency for that using DW. Recovery efficiencies of the two devices increase with the increase in NTUm, while they have different ranges of NTUm. NTUm of the DW is usually superior to that of the LD, due to the material difference. Then, the optimum methods to improve recovery efficiency of the two devices are clarified, i.e., increasing NTUm for an enthalpy recovery device using LD and choosing a reasonable rotation speed for that using DW, respectively. The present research will be beneficial to cast light on the relation between enthalpy recovery devices using LD and DW.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePerformance Comparison of Enthalpy Recovery Devices Using Liquid Desiccant and Desiccant Wheel
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4046063
    page51004
    treeJournal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2020:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian