Motivating Engineering Students by Providing Two Midterm Exams and Dropping the Lower MarkSource: Journal of Civil Engineering Education:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 001::page 04020009Author:Essam Dabbour
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000024Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: This paper investigated the effect of grade dropping on students’ performance, engagement, and satisfaction. In three different engineering courses that were taught by the author, an optional second midterm exam was offered near the end of the semester. The optional second midterm exam covered materials that were not covered by the first midterm exam. The lower mark of the two exams would be dropped for students who chose to take the optional second midterm exam. Both observational assessment (by using two-tailed z-tests and t-tests to measure the improvements in students’ performance, engagement, and satisfaction) and students’ feedback (through an online survey) were utilized. It was found that grade dropping led to significant improvements in students’ performance on the comprehensive final exam, class attendance rates (due to the increased motivation), and students’ satisfaction (as expressed in students’ evaluation for the adequacy and fairness of the grading policy). The lowest-performing and highest-performing students did not significantly benefit from grade dropping. Furthermore, the effects of grade dropping were more significant for male students than for female students.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Essam Dabbour | |
date accessioned | 2022-01-30T22:35:00Z | |
date available | 2022-01-30T22:35:00Z | |
date issued | 1/1/2021 | |
identifier other | (ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000024.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269210 | |
description abstract | This paper investigated the effect of grade dropping on students’ performance, engagement, and satisfaction. In three different engineering courses that were taught by the author, an optional second midterm exam was offered near the end of the semester. The optional second midterm exam covered materials that were not covered by the first midterm exam. The lower mark of the two exams would be dropped for students who chose to take the optional second midterm exam. Both observational assessment (by using two-tailed z-tests and t-tests to measure the improvements in students’ performance, engagement, and satisfaction) and students’ feedback (through an online survey) were utilized. It was found that grade dropping led to significant improvements in students’ performance on the comprehensive final exam, class attendance rates (due to the increased motivation), and students’ satisfaction (as expressed in students’ evaluation for the adequacy and fairness of the grading policy). The lowest-performing and highest-performing students did not significantly benefit from grade dropping. Furthermore, the effects of grade dropping were more significant for male students than for female students. | |
publisher | ASCE | |
title | Motivating Engineering Students by Providing Two Midterm Exams and Dropping the Lower Mark | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 147 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Civil Engineering Education | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000024 | |
journal fristpage | 04020009 | |
journal lastpage | 04020009-10 | |
page | 10 | |
tree | Journal of Civil Engineering Education:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |