A Study on Matching Between Centrifugal Compressor Impeller and Low Solidity Diffuser and Its Extension to Vaneless DiffuserSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 004::page 41026Author:Tamaki, Hideaki
DOI: 10.1115/1.4041003Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: A centrifugal compressor requires a wide operating range as well as a high efficiency. At high pressure ratios, the impeller discharge velocity becomes transonic and effective pressure recovery in a vaned or vaneless diffuser is necessary. At high pressure ratios, a vaned diffuser is used as it has high pressure recovery, but may have a narrow operating range. At low flow, diffuser stall may trigger surge. At high flow, choking in the throat of the vanes may limit the maximum flow rate. A low solidity diffuser allows a good pressure recovery because it has vanes to guide the flow and a wide operating range as there is no geometrical throat to limit the maximum flow. In experimental studies at a pressure ratio around 4:1, the author has replaced vaned diffusers with a range of low solidity diffusers to try to broaden the operating range. The test results showed that the low solidity diffuser also chokes. In this paper, a virtual throat is defined and its existence is confirmed by flow visualization and pressure measurements. A method to select low solidity diffusers is proposed based on test data and the fundamental nature of the flow. The extension of the proposed method to the selection of a vaneless diffuser is examined and a design approach for a vaneless diffuser system to minimize surge flow rate without limiting the attainable maximum flow rate is proposed.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Tamaki, Hideaki | |
date accessioned | 2019-03-17T11:01:00Z | |
date available | 2019-03-17T11:01:00Z | |
date copyright | 12/5/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2019 | |
identifier issn | 0742-4795 | |
identifier other | gtp_141_04_041026.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256531 | |
description abstract | A centrifugal compressor requires a wide operating range as well as a high efficiency. At high pressure ratios, the impeller discharge velocity becomes transonic and effective pressure recovery in a vaned or vaneless diffuser is necessary. At high pressure ratios, a vaned diffuser is used as it has high pressure recovery, but may have a narrow operating range. At low flow, diffuser stall may trigger surge. At high flow, choking in the throat of the vanes may limit the maximum flow rate. A low solidity diffuser allows a good pressure recovery because it has vanes to guide the flow and a wide operating range as there is no geometrical throat to limit the maximum flow. In experimental studies at a pressure ratio around 4:1, the author has replaced vaned diffusers with a range of low solidity diffusers to try to broaden the operating range. The test results showed that the low solidity diffuser also chokes. In this paper, a virtual throat is defined and its existence is confirmed by flow visualization and pressure measurements. A method to select low solidity diffusers is proposed based on test data and the fundamental nature of the flow. The extension of the proposed method to the selection of a vaneless diffuser is examined and a design approach for a vaneless diffuser system to minimize surge flow rate without limiting the attainable maximum flow rate is proposed. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | A Study on Matching Between Centrifugal Compressor Impeller and Low Solidity Diffuser and Its Extension to Vaneless Diffuser | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 141 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4041003 | |
journal fristpage | 41026 | |
journal lastpage | 041026-16 | |
tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |