Intelligent Reasoning for Gas Turbine Fault Isolation and Ambiguity ResolutionSource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 004::page 41023DOI: 10.1115/1.4040899Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: An engine health management (EHM) system typically consists of automated logic for data acquisition, parameter calculation, anomaly detection and eventually, fault identification (or isolation). Accurate fault isolation is pivotal to timely and cost-effective maintenance but is often challenging due to limited fault symptom observability and the intricacy of reasoning with heterogeneous parameters. Traditional fault isolation methods often utilize a single fault isolator (SFI) that primarily relies on gas path performance parameters. While effective for many performance-related faults, such approaches often suffer from ambiguity when two or more faults have signatures that are very similar when monitored by a rather limited number of gas path sensors. In these cases, the ambiguity often has to be resolved by experienced analysts using additional information that takes many different forms, such as various nongas path symptoms, full authority digital engine control fault codes, comparisons with the companion engine, maintenance records, and quite often, the analyst's gas turbine domain knowledge. This paper introduces an intelligent reasoner that combines the strength of an optimal, physics-based SFI and a fuzzy expert system that mimics the analytical process of human experts for ambiguity resolution. A prototype diagnostic reasoner software has been developed and evaluated using existing flight data. Significant performance improvements were observed as compared with traditional SFI results. As a generic reasoning framework, this approach can be applied not only to traditional snapshot data, but to full flight data analytics as well.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Tang, Liang | |
| contributor author | Volponi, Allan J. | |
| date accessioned | 2019-03-17T11:00:38Z | |
| date available | 2019-03-17T11:00:38Z | |
| date copyright | 12/4/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2019 | |
| identifier issn | 0742-4795 | |
| identifier other | gtp_141_04_041023.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4256518 | |
| description abstract | An engine health management (EHM) system typically consists of automated logic for data acquisition, parameter calculation, anomaly detection and eventually, fault identification (or isolation). Accurate fault isolation is pivotal to timely and cost-effective maintenance but is often challenging due to limited fault symptom observability and the intricacy of reasoning with heterogeneous parameters. Traditional fault isolation methods often utilize a single fault isolator (SFI) that primarily relies on gas path performance parameters. While effective for many performance-related faults, such approaches often suffer from ambiguity when two or more faults have signatures that are very similar when monitored by a rather limited number of gas path sensors. In these cases, the ambiguity often has to be resolved by experienced analysts using additional information that takes many different forms, such as various nongas path symptoms, full authority digital engine control fault codes, comparisons with the companion engine, maintenance records, and quite often, the analyst's gas turbine domain knowledge. This paper introduces an intelligent reasoner that combines the strength of an optimal, physics-based SFI and a fuzzy expert system that mimics the analytical process of human experts for ambiguity resolution. A prototype diagnostic reasoner software has been developed and evaluated using existing flight data. Significant performance improvements were observed as compared with traditional SFI results. As a generic reasoning framework, this approach can be applied not only to traditional snapshot data, but to full flight data analytics as well. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Intelligent Reasoning for Gas Turbine Fault Isolation and Ambiguity Resolution | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 141 | |
| journal issue | 4 | |
| journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4040899 | |
| journal fristpage | 41023 | |
| journal lastpage | 041023-9 | |
| tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2019:;volume( 141 ):;issue: 004 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |