Effects of Purge Flow Configuration on Sealing Effectiveness in a Rotor–Stator CavitySource: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 011::page 112502Author:Clark, Kenneth
,
Barringer, Michael
,
Johnson, David
,
Thole, Karen
,
Grover, Eric
,
Robak, Christopher
DOI: 10.1115/1.4040308Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Secondary air is bled from the compressor in a gas turbine engine to cool turbine components and seal the cavities between stages. Unsealed cavities can lead to hot gas ingestion, which can degrade critical components or, in extreme cases, can be catastrophic to engines. For this study, a 1.5 stage turbine with an engine-realistic rim seal was operated at an engine-relevant axial Reynolds number, rotational Reynolds number, and Mach number. Purge flow was introduced into the interstage cavity through distinct purge holes for two different configurations. This paper compares the two configurations over a range of purge flow rates. Sealing effectiveness measurements, deduced from the use of CO2 as a flow tracer, indicated that the sealing characteristics were improved by increasing the number of uniformly distributed purge holes and improved by increasing levels of purge flow. For the larger number of purge holes, a fully sealed cavity was possible, while for the smaller number of purge holes, a fully sealed cavity was not possible. For this representative cavity model, sealing effectiveness measurements were compared with a well-accepted orifice model derived from simplified cavity models. Sealing effectiveness levels at some locations within the cavity were well-predicted by the orifice model, but due to the complexity of the realistic rim seal and the purge flow delivery, the effectiveness levels at other locations were not well-predicted.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Clark, Kenneth | |
contributor author | Barringer, Michael | |
contributor author | Johnson, David | |
contributor author | Thole, Karen | |
contributor author | Grover, Eric | |
contributor author | Robak, Christopher | |
date accessioned | 2019-02-28T10:57:04Z | |
date available | 2019-02-28T10:57:04Z | |
date copyright | 7/12/2018 12:00:00 AM | |
date issued | 2018 | |
identifier issn | 0742-4795 | |
identifier other | gtp_140_11_112502.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4251096 | |
description abstract | Secondary air is bled from the compressor in a gas turbine engine to cool turbine components and seal the cavities between stages. Unsealed cavities can lead to hot gas ingestion, which can degrade critical components or, in extreme cases, can be catastrophic to engines. For this study, a 1.5 stage turbine with an engine-realistic rim seal was operated at an engine-relevant axial Reynolds number, rotational Reynolds number, and Mach number. Purge flow was introduced into the interstage cavity through distinct purge holes for two different configurations. This paper compares the two configurations over a range of purge flow rates. Sealing effectiveness measurements, deduced from the use of CO2 as a flow tracer, indicated that the sealing characteristics were improved by increasing the number of uniformly distributed purge holes and improved by increasing levels of purge flow. For the larger number of purge holes, a fully sealed cavity was possible, while for the smaller number of purge holes, a fully sealed cavity was not possible. For this representative cavity model, sealing effectiveness measurements were compared with a well-accepted orifice model derived from simplified cavity models. Sealing effectiveness levels at some locations within the cavity were well-predicted by the orifice model, but due to the complexity of the realistic rim seal and the purge flow delivery, the effectiveness levels at other locations were not well-predicted. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Effects of Purge Flow Configuration on Sealing Effectiveness in a Rotor–Stator Cavity | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 140 | |
journal issue | 11 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4040308 | |
journal fristpage | 112502 | |
journal lastpage | 112502-11 | |
tree | Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2018:;volume( 140 ):;issue: 011 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |