Adiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness Measurements Throughout Multirow Film Cooling ArraysSource: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 010::page 101008DOI: 10.1115/1.4035520Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Adiabatic film cooling effectiveness measurements are obtained using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) on a flat film cooled surface. The effects of blowing ratio and hole spacing are investigated for four multirow arrays comprised of eight rows containing 52 holes of 3.8 mm diameter with 20 deg inclination angles and hole length-to-diameter ratio of 11.2. The four arrays investigated have two different hole-to-hole spacings composed of cylindrical and diffuser holes. For the first case, lateral and streamwise pitches are 7.5 times the diameter. For the second case, pitch-to-diameter ratio is 14 in lateral direction and 10 in the streamwise direction. The holes are in a staggered arrangement. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements are taken for a blowing ratio range of 0.3–1.2 and a density ratio of 1.5, with CO2 injected as the coolant. A thorough boundary layer analysis is presented, and data were taken using hotwire anemometry with air injection, with boundary layer, and turbulence measurements taken at multiple locations in order to characterize the boundary layer. Local effectiveness, laterally averaged effectiveness, boundary layer thickness, momentum thickness, turbulence intensity, and turbulence length scale are presented. For the cylindrical holes, at the first row of injection, the film jets are still attached at a blowing ratio of 0.3. By a blowing ratio of 0.5, the jet is observed to lift off, and then impinge back onto the test surface. At a blowing ratio of 1.2, the jets lift off, but reattach much further downstream, spreading the coolant further along the test surface. A thorough uncertainty analysis has been conducted in order to fully understand the presented measurements and any shortcomings of the measurement technique. The maximum uncertainty of effectiveness and blowing ratio is 0.02 counts of effectiveness and 3%, respectively.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Natsui, Greg | |
contributor author | Little, Zachary | |
contributor author | Kapat, Jayanta S. | |
contributor author | Dees, Jason E. | |
date accessioned | 2017-11-25T07:19:57Z | |
date available | 2017-11-25T07:19:57Z | |
date copyright | 2017/16/5 | |
date issued | 2017 | |
identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
identifier other | turbo_139_10_101008.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4236121 | |
description abstract | Adiabatic film cooling effectiveness measurements are obtained using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) on a flat film cooled surface. The effects of blowing ratio and hole spacing are investigated for four multirow arrays comprised of eight rows containing 52 holes of 3.8 mm diameter with 20 deg inclination angles and hole length-to-diameter ratio of 11.2. The four arrays investigated have two different hole-to-hole spacings composed of cylindrical and diffuser holes. For the first case, lateral and streamwise pitches are 7.5 times the diameter. For the second case, pitch-to-diameter ratio is 14 in lateral direction and 10 in the streamwise direction. The holes are in a staggered arrangement. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements are taken for a blowing ratio range of 0.3–1.2 and a density ratio of 1.5, with CO2 injected as the coolant. A thorough boundary layer analysis is presented, and data were taken using hotwire anemometry with air injection, with boundary layer, and turbulence measurements taken at multiple locations in order to characterize the boundary layer. Local effectiveness, laterally averaged effectiveness, boundary layer thickness, momentum thickness, turbulence intensity, and turbulence length scale are presented. For the cylindrical holes, at the first row of injection, the film jets are still attached at a blowing ratio of 0.3. By a blowing ratio of 0.5, the jet is observed to lift off, and then impinge back onto the test surface. At a blowing ratio of 1.2, the jets lift off, but reattach much further downstream, spreading the coolant further along the test surface. A thorough uncertainty analysis has been conducted in order to fully understand the presented measurements and any shortcomings of the measurement technique. The maximum uncertainty of effectiveness and blowing ratio is 0.02 counts of effectiveness and 3%, respectively. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Adiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness Measurements Throughout Multirow Film Cooling Arrays | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 139 | |
journal issue | 10 | |
journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4035520 | |
journal fristpage | 101008 | |
journal lastpage | 101008-12 | |
tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 010 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |