Show simple item record

contributor authorNatsui, Greg
contributor authorLittle, Zachary
contributor authorKapat, Jayanta S.
contributor authorDees, Jason E.
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:57Z
date available2017-11-25T07:19:57Z
date copyright2017/16/5
date issued2017
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_139_10_101008.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4236121
description abstractAdiabatic film cooling effectiveness measurements are obtained using pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) on a flat film cooled surface. The effects of blowing ratio and hole spacing are investigated for four multirow arrays comprised of eight rows containing 52 holes of 3.8 mm diameter with 20 deg inclination angles and hole length-to-diameter ratio of 11.2. The four arrays investigated have two different hole-to-hole spacings composed of cylindrical and diffuser holes. For the first case, lateral and streamwise pitches are 7.5 times the diameter. For the second case, pitch-to-diameter ratio is 14 in lateral direction and 10 in the streamwise direction. The holes are in a staggered arrangement. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements are taken for a blowing ratio range of 0.3–1.2 and a density ratio of 1.5, with CO2 injected as the coolant. A thorough boundary layer analysis is presented, and data were taken using hotwire anemometry with air injection, with boundary layer, and turbulence measurements taken at multiple locations in order to characterize the boundary layer. Local effectiveness, laterally averaged effectiveness, boundary layer thickness, momentum thickness, turbulence intensity, and turbulence length scale are presented. For the cylindrical holes, at the first row of injection, the film jets are still attached at a blowing ratio of 0.3. By a blowing ratio of 0.5, the jet is observed to lift off, and then impinge back onto the test surface. At a blowing ratio of 1.2, the jets lift off, but reattach much further downstream, spreading the coolant further along the test surface. A thorough uncertainty analysis has been conducted in order to fully understand the presented measurements and any shortcomings of the measurement technique. The maximum uncertainty of effectiveness and blowing ratio is 0.02 counts of effectiveness and 3%, respectively.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAdiabatic Film Cooling Effectiveness Measurements Throughout Multirow Film Cooling Arrays
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4035520
journal fristpage101008
journal lastpage101008-12
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record