Thermo-Fluid Optimization of a Solar Porous Absorber With a Variable Pore StructureSource: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005::page 51012DOI: 10.1115/1.4037350Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Optimization based on reconstruction of the velocity, temperature, and radiation fields in a porous absorber with continuous linear porosity or pore diameter distribution is carried out in this work. This study analyzes three typical linear pore structure distributions: increasing (“I”), decreasing (“D”), and constant (“C”) types, respectively. In general, the D type porosity (ϕ) layout combined with the I type pore diameter (dp) distribution would be an excellent pore structure layout for a porous absorber. The poor performance range, which should be avoided in the absorber design, is found to be within a wide range of porosity layouts (ϕi = ∼0.7 and ϕo > 0.6) and pore diameter layouts (di = 1.5–2.5 mm), respectively. With a large inlet porosity (ϕi > 0.8), the D type layout with larger porosity gradient (Gp) has a better thermal performance; however, the I type dp layout with a smaller inlet pore diameter (di < 1.5 mm) and a larger pore diameter gradient (Gdp) is recommended when considering the lower pressure drop. Different pore structure layouts (D type or I type) have a significant effect on the pressure drop, even with the same average ϕa and da, the maximum deviation can be up to 70.1%. The comprehensive performance evaluation criteria (PEC) value shows that the D type ϕ layout with a larger ϕa has an excellent thermopressure drop performance, and a part of PEC values for the I type dp layout are greater than unity.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Wang, P. | |
contributor author | Li, J. B. | |
contributor author | Vafai, K. | |
contributor author | Zhao, L. | |
contributor author | Zhou, L. | |
date accessioned | 2017-11-25T07:19:21Z | |
date available | 2017-11-25T07:19:21Z | |
date copyright | 2017/23/8 | |
date issued | 2017 | |
identifier issn | 0199-6231 | |
identifier other | sol_139_05_051012.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235759 | |
description abstract | Optimization based on reconstruction of the velocity, temperature, and radiation fields in a porous absorber with continuous linear porosity or pore diameter distribution is carried out in this work. This study analyzes three typical linear pore structure distributions: increasing (“I”), decreasing (“D”), and constant (“C”) types, respectively. In general, the D type porosity (ϕ) layout combined with the I type pore diameter (dp) distribution would be an excellent pore structure layout for a porous absorber. The poor performance range, which should be avoided in the absorber design, is found to be within a wide range of porosity layouts (ϕi = ∼0.7 and ϕo > 0.6) and pore diameter layouts (di = 1.5–2.5 mm), respectively. With a large inlet porosity (ϕi > 0.8), the D type layout with larger porosity gradient (Gp) has a better thermal performance; however, the I type dp layout with a smaller inlet pore diameter (di < 1.5 mm) and a larger pore diameter gradient (Gdp) is recommended when considering the lower pressure drop. Different pore structure layouts (D type or I type) have a significant effect on the pressure drop, even with the same average ϕa and da, the maximum deviation can be up to 70.1%. The comprehensive performance evaluation criteria (PEC) value shows that the D type ϕ layout with a larger ϕa has an excellent thermopressure drop performance, and a part of PEC values for the I type dp layout are greater than unity. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Thermo-Fluid Optimization of a Solar Porous Absorber With a Variable Pore Structure | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 139 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4037350 | |
journal fristpage | 51012 | |
journal lastpage | 051012-5 | |
tree | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |