YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Thermo-Fluid Optimization of a Solar Porous Absorber With a Variable Pore Structure

    Source: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005::page 51012
    Author:
    Wang, P.
    ,
    Li, J. B.
    ,
    Vafai, K.
    ,
    Zhao, L.
    ,
    Zhou, L.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4037350
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Optimization based on reconstruction of the velocity, temperature, and radiation fields in a porous absorber with continuous linear porosity or pore diameter distribution is carried out in this work. This study analyzes three typical linear pore structure distributions: increasing (“I”), decreasing (“D”), and constant (“C”) types, respectively. In general, the D type porosity (ϕ) layout combined with the I type pore diameter (dp) distribution would be an excellent pore structure layout for a porous absorber. The poor performance range, which should be avoided in the absorber design, is found to be within a wide range of porosity layouts (ϕi = ∼0.7 and ϕo > 0.6) and pore diameter layouts (di = 1.5–2.5 mm), respectively. With a large inlet porosity (ϕi > 0.8), the D type layout with larger porosity gradient (Gp) has a better thermal performance; however, the I type dp layout with a smaller inlet pore diameter (di < 1.5 mm) and a larger pore diameter gradient (Gdp) is recommended when considering the lower pressure drop. Different pore structure layouts (D type or I type) have a significant effect on the pressure drop, even with the same average ϕa and da, the maximum deviation can be up to 70.1%. The comprehensive performance evaluation criteria (PEC) value shows that the D type ϕ layout with a larger ϕa has an excellent thermopressure drop performance, and a part of PEC values for the I type dp layout are greater than unity.
    • Download: (2.247Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Thermo-Fluid Optimization of a Solar Porous Absorber With a Variable Pore Structure

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235759
    Collections
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWang, P.
    contributor authorLi, J. B.
    contributor authorVafai, K.
    contributor authorZhao, L.
    contributor authorZhou, L.
    date accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:21Z
    date available2017-11-25T07:19:21Z
    date copyright2017/23/8
    date issued2017
    identifier issn0199-6231
    identifier othersol_139_05_051012.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235759
    description abstractOptimization based on reconstruction of the velocity, temperature, and radiation fields in a porous absorber with continuous linear porosity or pore diameter distribution is carried out in this work. This study analyzes three typical linear pore structure distributions: increasing (“I”), decreasing (“D”), and constant (“C”) types, respectively. In general, the D type porosity (ϕ) layout combined with the I type pore diameter (dp) distribution would be an excellent pore structure layout for a porous absorber. The poor performance range, which should be avoided in the absorber design, is found to be within a wide range of porosity layouts (ϕi = ∼0.7 and ϕo > 0.6) and pore diameter layouts (di = 1.5–2.5 mm), respectively. With a large inlet porosity (ϕi > 0.8), the D type layout with larger porosity gradient (Gp) has a better thermal performance; however, the I type dp layout with a smaller inlet pore diameter (di < 1.5 mm) and a larger pore diameter gradient (Gdp) is recommended when considering the lower pressure drop. Different pore structure layouts (D type or I type) have a significant effect on the pressure drop, even with the same average ϕa and da, the maximum deviation can be up to 70.1%. The comprehensive performance evaluation criteria (PEC) value shows that the D type ϕ layout with a larger ϕa has an excellent thermopressure drop performance, and a part of PEC values for the I type dp layout are greater than unity.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThermo-Fluid Optimization of a Solar Porous Absorber With a Variable Pore Structure
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4037350
    journal fristpage51012
    journal lastpage051012-5
    treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian