YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties for Pneumatic Multihole Probes Using a Monte Carlo Method

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 007::page 72605
    Author:
    Hölle, Magnus
    ,
    Bartsch, Christian
    ,
    Jeschke, Peter
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4035626
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The subject of this paper is a statistical method for the evaluation of the uncertainties for pneumatic multihole probe measurements. The method can be applied to different types of evaluation algorithms and is suitable for steady flow-field measurements in compressible flows. The evaluation of uncertainties is performed by a Monte Carlo method (MCM). Each calibration and measurement input quantity are randomly varied on the basis of its corresponding probability density function (PDF) and propagated through the deterministic parameter evaluation algorithm. Other than linear Taylor series based uncertainty evaluation methods, the MCM features several advantages: it does not suffer from lower-order expansion errors and can therefore reproduce nonlinearity effects. Furthermore, different types of PDFs can be assumed for the input quantities, and the corresponding coverage intervals can be calculated for any coverage probability. To demonstrate the uncertainty evaluation, a calibration and subsequent measurements in the wake of an airfoil with a five-hole probe are performed. The MCM is applied to different parameter evaluation algorithms. It is found that the MCM cannot be applied to polynomial curve fits, if the differences between the calibration data and the polynomial curve fits are of the same order of magnitude compared to the calibration uncertainty. Since this method has not yet been used for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties for pneumatic multihole probes, the aim of this paper is to present a highly accurate and easy-to-implement uncertainty evaluation method.
    • Download: (1.917Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties for Pneumatic Multihole Probes Using a Monte Carlo Method

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4233747
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHölle, Magnus
    contributor authorBartsch, Christian
    contributor authorJeschke, Peter
    date accessioned2017-11-25T07:15:56Z
    date available2017-11-25T07:15:56Z
    date copyright2017/7/3
    date issued2017
    identifier issn0742-4795
    identifier othergtp_139_07_072605.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4233747
    description abstractThe subject of this paper is a statistical method for the evaluation of the uncertainties for pneumatic multihole probe measurements. The method can be applied to different types of evaluation algorithms and is suitable for steady flow-field measurements in compressible flows. The evaluation of uncertainties is performed by a Monte Carlo method (MCM). Each calibration and measurement input quantity are randomly varied on the basis of its corresponding probability density function (PDF) and propagated through the deterministic parameter evaluation algorithm. Other than linear Taylor series based uncertainty evaluation methods, the MCM features several advantages: it does not suffer from lower-order expansion errors and can therefore reproduce nonlinearity effects. Furthermore, different types of PDFs can be assumed for the input quantities, and the corresponding coverage intervals can be calculated for any coverage probability. To demonstrate the uncertainty evaluation, a calibration and subsequent measurements in the wake of an airfoil with a five-hole probe are performed. The MCM is applied to different parameter evaluation algorithms. It is found that the MCM cannot be applied to polynomial curve fits, if the differences between the calibration data and the polynomial curve fits are of the same order of magnitude compared to the calibration uncertainty. Since this method has not yet been used for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties for pneumatic multihole probes, the aim of this paper is to present a highly accurate and easy-to-implement uncertainty evaluation method.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEvaluation of Measurement Uncertainties for Pneumatic Multihole Probes Using a Monte Carlo Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4035626
    journal fristpage72605
    journal lastpage072605-8
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian