Modeling Nonequilibrium Combustion Chemistry Using Constrained Equilibrium Flamelet Model for Kerosene Spray FlameSource: Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2016:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 001::page 11004DOI: 10.1115/1.4030700Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Numerical simulation employing different models is popularly used to predict spray combustion of liquid fuels. In the present work, we have compared the effects of three different combustion models, viz., eddy dissipation model, laminar flamelet model with detailed chemical reaction mechanism, and constrained equilibrium flamelet model, on the temperature, soot, and NOx distributions in an axisymmetric combustor burning kerosene spray. Experiments have also been performed in a combustor of the same geometry to validate some predictions from the models. The constraint condition for the equilibrium flamelet model has been adopted by suitably accounting the effects of scalar dissipation rate on the prediction of scalar variables in a laminar flamelet and by considering the mixture fraction and scalar dissipation rate distributions in the combustor under test. It is found that the results predicted by the two flamelet models agree closely between them and also with the experiments. On the other hand, the eddy dissipation model predicts a much higher flame temperature, soot, and NOx concentrations in the combustor. The results suggest the importance of chemistry in the prediction of the turbulent spray flame. It also suggests that with a proper choice of the constraint condition, the equilibrium flamelet model can address the nonequilibrium chemistry in the flame due to the high value of scalar dissipation rate.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Ghose, Prakash | |
contributor author | Datta, Amitava | |
contributor author | Mukhopadhyay, Achintya | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:33:15Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:33:15Z | |
date issued | 2016 | |
identifier issn | 1948-5085 | |
identifier other | tsea_008_01_011004.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162514 | |
description abstract | Numerical simulation employing different models is popularly used to predict spray combustion of liquid fuels. In the present work, we have compared the effects of three different combustion models, viz., eddy dissipation model, laminar flamelet model with detailed chemical reaction mechanism, and constrained equilibrium flamelet model, on the temperature, soot, and NOx distributions in an axisymmetric combustor burning kerosene spray. Experiments have also been performed in a combustor of the same geometry to validate some predictions from the models. The constraint condition for the equilibrium flamelet model has been adopted by suitably accounting the effects of scalar dissipation rate on the prediction of scalar variables in a laminar flamelet and by considering the mixture fraction and scalar dissipation rate distributions in the combustor under test. It is found that the results predicted by the two flamelet models agree closely between them and also with the experiments. On the other hand, the eddy dissipation model predicts a much higher flame temperature, soot, and NOx concentrations in the combustor. The results suggest the importance of chemistry in the prediction of the turbulent spray flame. It also suggests that with a proper choice of the constraint condition, the equilibrium flamelet model can address the nonequilibrium chemistry in the flame due to the high value of scalar dissipation rate. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Modeling Nonequilibrium Combustion Chemistry Using Constrained Equilibrium Flamelet Model for Kerosene Spray Flame | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 8 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4030700 | |
journal fristpage | 11004 | |
journal lastpage | 11004 | |
identifier eissn | 1948-5093 | |
tree | Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications:;2016:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |