YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    S Ethane Brayton Power Conversion Systems for Concentrated Solar Power Plant

    Source: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001::page 11012
    Author:
    Enrأ­quez, Luis Coco
    ,
    Muأ±oz
    ,
    Peأ±alosa, Josأ© Marأ­a Martأ­nez
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4032143
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The objective of this investigation is the comparison between supercritical ethane (sethane, C2H6) and supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) Brayton power cycles for linefocusing concentrated solar power plants (CSP). In this study, CSP are analyzed with linear solar collectors (parabolic trough (PTC) or linear Fresnel (LF)), direct molten salt (MS), or direct steam generation (DSG) as heat transfer fluids (HTF), and four supercritical Brayton power cycles configurations: simple Brayton cycle (SB), recompression cycle (RC), partial cooling with recompression cycle (PCRC), and recompression with main compression intercooling cycle (RCMCI). All Brayton power cycles were assessed with two working fluids: sCO2 and sethane. As a main result, we confirmed that sethane Brayton power cycles provide better net plant performance than sCO2 cycles for turbine inlet temperatures (TITs) from 300 آ°C to 550 آ°C. As an example, the sethane RCMCI plant configuration net efficiency is ∼42.11% for TIT = 400 آ°C, and with sCO2 the plant performance is ∼40%. The CSP Brayton power plants were also compared with another stateoftheart CSP with DSG in linear solar collectors and a subcritical water Rankine power cycle with direct reheating (DRH), and a maximum plant performance between ∼40% and 41% (TIT = 550 آ°C).
    • Download: (2.643Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      S Ethane Brayton Power Conversion Systems for Concentrated Solar Power Plant

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/162442
    Collections
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEnrأ­quez, Luis Coco
    contributor authorMuأ±oz
    contributor authorPeأ±alosa, Josأ© Marأ­a Martأ­nez
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:33:00Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:33:00Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0199-6231
    identifier othersol_138_01_011012.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162442
    description abstractThe objective of this investigation is the comparison between supercritical ethane (sethane, C2H6) and supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) Brayton power cycles for linefocusing concentrated solar power plants (CSP). In this study, CSP are analyzed with linear solar collectors (parabolic trough (PTC) or linear Fresnel (LF)), direct molten salt (MS), or direct steam generation (DSG) as heat transfer fluids (HTF), and four supercritical Brayton power cycles configurations: simple Brayton cycle (SB), recompression cycle (RC), partial cooling with recompression cycle (PCRC), and recompression with main compression intercooling cycle (RCMCI). All Brayton power cycles were assessed with two working fluids: sCO2 and sethane. As a main result, we confirmed that sethane Brayton power cycles provide better net plant performance than sCO2 cycles for turbine inlet temperatures (TITs) from 300 آ°C to 550 آ°C. As an example, the sethane RCMCI plant configuration net efficiency is ∼42.11% for TIT = 400 آ°C, and with sCO2 the plant performance is ∼40%. The CSP Brayton power plants were also compared with another stateoftheart CSP with DSG in linear solar collectors and a subcritical water Rankine power cycle with direct reheating (DRH), and a maximum plant performance between ∼40% and 41% (TIT = 550 آ°C).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleS Ethane Brayton Power Conversion Systems for Concentrated Solar Power Plant
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4032143
    journal fristpage11012
    journal lastpage11012
    identifier eissn1528-8986
    treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian