Show simple item record

contributor authorEwest, Daniel
contributor authorAlmroth, Per
contributor authorSjأ¶din, Bjأ¶rn
contributor authorLeidermark, Daniel
contributor authorSimonsson, Kjell
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:28:30Z
date available2017-05-09T01:28:30Z
date issued2016
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier othergtp_138_06_062101.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161096
description abstractWith increasing use of renewable energy sources, an industrial gas turbine is often a competitive solution to balance the power grid. However, life robustness approaches for gas turbine components operating under increasingly cyclic conditions are a challenging task. Ductile superalloys, as Haynes 230, are often used in stationary gas turbine hot parts such as combustors. The main load for such components is due to nonhomogeneous thermal expansion within or between parts. As the material is ductile, there is considerable redistribution of stresses and strains due to inelastic deformations during the crack initiation phase. Therefore, the subsequent crack growth occurs through a material with significant residual stresses and strains. In this work, fatigue crack propagation experiments, including the initiation phase, have been performed on a single edge notched specimen under strain controlled conditions. The test results are compared to fracture mechanics analyses using the linear خ”K and the nonlinear خ”J approaches, and an attempt to quantify the difference in terms of a life prediction is made. For the tested notched geometry, material, and strain ranges, the difference in the results using خ”Keff or خ”Jeff is larger than the scatter seen when fitting the model to the experimental data. The largest differences can be found for short crack lengths, when the cyclic plastic work is the largest. The خ”J approach clearly shows better agreement with the experimental results in this regime.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison Between Linear and Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Experimental Data for the Ductile Superalloy Haynes 230
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4031712
journal fristpage62101
journal lastpage62101
identifier eissn0742-4795
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record