YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of a Mono , Twin , and Double Scroll Turbine for Automotive Applications

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005::page 52301
    Author:
    Walkingshaw, Jason
    ,
    Iosifidis, Georgios
    ,
    Scheuermann, Tobias
    ,
    Filsinger, Dietmar
    ,
    Ikeya, Nobuyuki
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4031449
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: As a means of meeting ever increasing emissions and fuel economy demands, car manufacturers are using aggressive engine downsizing. To maintain the power output of the engine, turbocharging is typically used. Due to the mismatch of the mass flow characteristics of the engine to the turbocharger, at low engine mass flow rates (MFRs), the turbocharger can suffer from slow response known as “Turbolag.â€‌ Monoscroll turbines are capable of providing good performance at high MFRs and in conjunction with low inertia mixed flow turbines can offer some benefits for transient engine response. With a multientry system, the individual volute sizing can be matched to the single mass flow pulse from the engine cylinders. The exhaust pulse energy can be better utilized by the turbocharger turbine improving turbocharger response, while the interaction of the engine exhaust pulses can be better avoided, improving the scavenging of the engine. The behavior of a monoscroll turbocharger with the engine using engine simulation tools has been well established. What requires further investigation is the comparison with multientry turbines. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to examine the singleadmission behavior of a twinand doublescroll turbine. Turbocharger gas stand maps of the multientry turbines have been measured at full and single admissions. This data have been used in a 0D engine model. In addition, the turbine stage has been tested on the engine, and a validation of the engine model against the engine test data is presented. Using the validated engine model, a comparison has been made to understand the differences in the sizing requirements of the turbine and the interaction of the monoscroll and multientry turbines with the engine. The impact of the different efficiency and MFR trends of the mono and multientry turbochargers is discussed, and the tradeoffs between the design configurations regarding onengine behavior are investigated.
    • Download: (3.392Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of a Mono , Twin , and Double Scroll Turbine for Automotive Applications

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/161051
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWalkingshaw, Jason
    contributor authorIosifidis, Georgios
    contributor authorScheuermann, Tobias
    contributor authorFilsinger, Dietmar
    contributor authorIkeya, Nobuyuki
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:28:19Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:28:19Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier othergtp_138_05_052301.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161051
    description abstractAs a means of meeting ever increasing emissions and fuel economy demands, car manufacturers are using aggressive engine downsizing. To maintain the power output of the engine, turbocharging is typically used. Due to the mismatch of the mass flow characteristics of the engine to the turbocharger, at low engine mass flow rates (MFRs), the turbocharger can suffer from slow response known as “Turbolag.â€‌ Monoscroll turbines are capable of providing good performance at high MFRs and in conjunction with low inertia mixed flow turbines can offer some benefits for transient engine response. With a multientry system, the individual volute sizing can be matched to the single mass flow pulse from the engine cylinders. The exhaust pulse energy can be better utilized by the turbocharger turbine improving turbocharger response, while the interaction of the engine exhaust pulses can be better avoided, improving the scavenging of the engine. The behavior of a monoscroll turbocharger with the engine using engine simulation tools has been well established. What requires further investigation is the comparison with multientry turbines. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to examine the singleadmission behavior of a twinand doublescroll turbine. Turbocharger gas stand maps of the multientry turbines have been measured at full and single admissions. This data have been used in a 0D engine model. In addition, the turbine stage has been tested on the engine, and a validation of the engine model against the engine test data is presented. Using the validated engine model, a comparison has been made to understand the differences in the sizing requirements of the turbine and the interaction of the monoscroll and multientry turbines with the engine. The impact of the different efficiency and MFR trends of the mono and multientry turbochargers is discussed, and the tradeoffs between the design configurations regarding onengine behavior are investigated.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparison of a Mono , Twin , and Double Scroll Turbine for Automotive Applications
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4031449
    journal fristpage52301
    journal lastpage52301
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian