YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of Cavitation Models for Flows in Diesel Injectors With Single and Two Fluid Approaches

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001::page 11504
    Author:
    Saha, Kaushik
    ,
    Li, Xianguo
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4031224
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Several recent cavitation models for the analysis of twophase flows in diesel injectors with singleand twofluid modeling approaches have been evaluated, including the Saha–AbuRamandan–Li (SAL), Schnerr–Sauer (SS), and Zwart–Gerber–Belamri (ZGB) models. The SAL model is a singlefluid model, while the other two models have been implemented with both singleand twofluid approaches. Numerical predictions are compared with experimental results available in literature, qualitatively with experimental images of twophase flow in an optically accessible nozzle, and quantitatively with measured mass flow rates and velocity profiles. It is found that at low injection pressure differentials there can be considerable discrepancy in the predictions of the vapor distribution from the three models considered. This discrepancy is reduced as the injection pressure differential is increased. Implementation of the SS and ZGB models with singleand twofluid approaches yields noticeable differences in the results because of the relative velocity between the two phases, with twofluid approach providing better agreement with experimental results. The performance of the SS and ZGB models implemented with the twofluid approach is comparable with the SAL singlefluid model, but with significantly more computational time. Overall, the SAL singlefluid model performs comparatively better with respect to the other two models.
    • Download: (2.255Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Assessment of Cavitation Models for Flows in Diesel Injectors With Single and Two Fluid Approaches

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/160979
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSaha, Kaushik
    contributor authorLi, Xianguo
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:28:01Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:28:01Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier othergtp_138_01_011504.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160979
    description abstractSeveral recent cavitation models for the analysis of twophase flows in diesel injectors with singleand twofluid modeling approaches have been evaluated, including the Saha–AbuRamandan–Li (SAL), Schnerr–Sauer (SS), and Zwart–Gerber–Belamri (ZGB) models. The SAL model is a singlefluid model, while the other two models have been implemented with both singleand twofluid approaches. Numerical predictions are compared with experimental results available in literature, qualitatively with experimental images of twophase flow in an optically accessible nozzle, and quantitatively with measured mass flow rates and velocity profiles. It is found that at low injection pressure differentials there can be considerable discrepancy in the predictions of the vapor distribution from the three models considered. This discrepancy is reduced as the injection pressure differential is increased. Implementation of the SS and ZGB models with singleand twofluid approaches yields noticeable differences in the results because of the relative velocity between the two phases, with twofluid approach providing better agreement with experimental results. The performance of the SS and ZGB models implemented with the twofluid approach is comparable with the SAL singlefluid model, but with significantly more computational time. Overall, the SAL singlefluid model performs comparatively better with respect to the other two models.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleAssessment of Cavitation Models for Flows in Diesel Injectors With Single and Two Fluid Approaches
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4031224
    journal fristpage11504
    journal lastpage11504
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian