YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    On the Difference Between Risk as Seen From the Perspectives of the Analysts and Management

    Source: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003::page 31002
    Author:
    Aven, Terje
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4032002
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In its general form, risk is quantitatively described by analysts by identifying a set of consequences C of an activity and using a measure Q to express the uncertainties related to these consequences. This risk description (C,Q) is based on a background knowledge K, including assumptions on which the (C,Q) assessment was found. The purpose of the present paper is to draw attention to the fact that risk from the perspective of the decisionmaker necessarily needs to see beyond (C,Q); judgments of the background knowledge K of the analysts are an integral part of the management’s and the decisionmaker’s risk description and evaluation. Thus, this risk description of the analyst is (C,Q|K), whereas the management and the decisionmaker need to reflect on the unconditional description (C,Q,K), seeing K as containing potential risk sources. Ways of characterizing this risk are presented and discussed. An example from the oil and gas industry is used to illustrate the discussions and show the importance for the practice of risk assessment and management.
    • Download: (380.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      On the Difference Between Risk as Seen From the Perspectives of the Analysts and Management

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/160174
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAven, Terje
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:25:28Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:25:28Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn2332-9017
    identifier otherRISK_2_3_031002.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160174
    description abstractIn its general form, risk is quantitatively described by analysts by identifying a set of consequences C of an activity and using a measure Q to express the uncertainties related to these consequences. This risk description (C,Q) is based on a background knowledge K, including assumptions on which the (C,Q) assessment was found. The purpose of the present paper is to draw attention to the fact that risk from the perspective of the decisionmaker necessarily needs to see beyond (C,Q); judgments of the background knowledge K of the analysts are an integral part of the management’s and the decisionmaker’s risk description and evaluation. Thus, this risk description of the analyst is (C,Q|K), whereas the management and the decisionmaker need to reflect on the unconditional description (C,Q,K), seeing K as containing potential risk sources. Ways of characterizing this risk are presented and discussed. An example from the oil and gas industry is used to illustrate the discussions and show the importance for the practice of risk assessment and management.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleOn the Difference Between Risk as Seen From the Perspectives of the Analysts and Management
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume2
    journal issue3
    journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4032002
    journal fristpage31002
    journal lastpage31002
    treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian