Show simple item record

contributor authorAven, Terje
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:25:28Z
date available2017-05-09T01:25:28Z
date issued2016
identifier issn2332-9017
identifier otherRISK_2_3_031002.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/160174
description abstractIn its general form, risk is quantitatively described by analysts by identifying a set of consequences C of an activity and using a measure Q to express the uncertainties related to these consequences. This risk description (C,Q) is based on a background knowledge K, including assumptions on which the (C,Q) assessment was found. The purpose of the present paper is to draw attention to the fact that risk from the perspective of the decisionmaker necessarily needs to see beyond (C,Q); judgments of the background knowledge K of the analysts are an integral part of the management’s and the decisionmaker’s risk description and evaluation. Thus, this risk description of the analyst is (C,Q|K), whereas the management and the decisionmaker need to reflect on the unconditional description (C,Q,K), seeing K as containing potential risk sources. Ways of characterizing this risk are presented and discussed. An example from the oil and gas industry is used to illustrate the discussions and show the importance for the practice of risk assessment and management.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleOn the Difference Between Risk as Seen From the Perspectives of the Analysts and Management
typeJournal Paper
journal volume2
journal issue3
journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4032002
journal fristpage31002
journal lastpage31002
treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2016:;volume( 002 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record