Future Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aeroâ€گenginesSource: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 008::page 81005DOI: 10.1115/1.4029363Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a critical tool in the design of aeroengines. Increasing demand for higher efficiency, performance, and reduced emissions of noise and pollutants has focused attention on secondary flows, small scale internal flows, and flow interactions. In conjunction with low order correlations and experimental data, RANS (Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes) modeling has been used effectively for some time, particularly at high Reynolds numbers and at design conditions. However, the range of flows throughout an engine is vast, with most, in reality being inherently unsteady. There are many cases where RANS can perform poorly, particularly in zones characterized by strong streamline curvature, separation, transition, relaminarization, and heat transfer. The reliable use of RANS has also been limited by its strong dependence on turbulence model choice and related adhoc corrections. For complex flows, largeeddy simulation (LES) methods provide reliable solutions, largely independent of turbulence model choice, and at a relatively low cost for particular flows. LES can now be used to provide in depth knowledge of flow physics, for example, in areas such as transition and real wall roughness effects. This can be used to inform RANS and lower order modeling (LOM). For some flows, LES can now even be used for design. Existing literature is used to show the potential of LES for a range of flows in different zones of the engine. Based on flow taxonomy, best practices including RANS/LES zonalization, meshing requirements, and turbulent inflow conditions are introduced, leading to the proposal of a tentative expert system for industrial use. In this way, LES becomes a well controlled tool, suitable for design use and reduces the burden on the end user. The problem sizes tackled however have lagged behind potential computing power, hence future LES use at scale requires substantial progress in several key areas. Current and future solver technologies are thus examined and the potential current and future use of LES is considered.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Tyacke, James C. | |
| contributor author | Tucker, Paul G. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:24:40Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:24:40Z | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier issn | 0889-504X | |
| identifier other | turbo_137_08_081005.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159954 | |
| description abstract | Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a critical tool in the design of aeroengines. Increasing demand for higher efficiency, performance, and reduced emissions of noise and pollutants has focused attention on secondary flows, small scale internal flows, and flow interactions. In conjunction with low order correlations and experimental data, RANS (Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes) modeling has been used effectively for some time, particularly at high Reynolds numbers and at design conditions. However, the range of flows throughout an engine is vast, with most, in reality being inherently unsteady. There are many cases where RANS can perform poorly, particularly in zones characterized by strong streamline curvature, separation, transition, relaminarization, and heat transfer. The reliable use of RANS has also been limited by its strong dependence on turbulence model choice and related adhoc corrections. For complex flows, largeeddy simulation (LES) methods provide reliable solutions, largely independent of turbulence model choice, and at a relatively low cost for particular flows. LES can now be used to provide in depth knowledge of flow physics, for example, in areas such as transition and real wall roughness effects. This can be used to inform RANS and lower order modeling (LOM). For some flows, LES can now even be used for design. Existing literature is used to show the potential of LES for a range of flows in different zones of the engine. Based on flow taxonomy, best practices including RANS/LES zonalization, meshing requirements, and turbulent inflow conditions are introduced, leading to the proposal of a tentative expert system for industrial use. In this way, LES becomes a well controlled tool, suitable for design use and reduces the burden on the end user. The problem sizes tackled however have lagged behind potential computing power, hence future LES use at scale requires substantial progress in several key areas. Current and future solver technologies are thus examined and the potential current and future use of LES is considered. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Future Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aeroâ€گengines | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 137 | |
| journal issue | 8 | |
| journal title | Journal of Turbomachinery | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4029363 | |
| journal fristpage | 81005 | |
| journal lastpage | 81005 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8900 | |
| tree | Journal of Turbomachinery:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 008 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |