Show simple item record

contributor authorTyacke, James C.
contributor authorTucker, Paul G.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:24:40Z
date available2017-05-09T01:24:40Z
date issued2015
identifier issn0889-504X
identifier otherturbo_137_08_081005.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159954
description abstractComputational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a critical tool in the design of aeroengines. Increasing demand for higher efficiency, performance, and reduced emissions of noise and pollutants has focused attention on secondary flows, small scale internal flows, and flow interactions. In conjunction with low order correlations and experimental data, RANS (Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes) modeling has been used effectively for some time, particularly at high Reynolds numbers and at design conditions. However, the range of flows throughout an engine is vast, with most, in reality being inherently unsteady. There are many cases where RANS can perform poorly, particularly in zones characterized by strong streamline curvature, separation, transition, relaminarization, and heat transfer. The reliable use of RANS has also been limited by its strong dependence on turbulence model choice and related adhoc corrections. For complex flows, largeeddy simulation (LES) methods provide reliable solutions, largely independent of turbulence model choice, and at a relatively low cost for particular flows. LES can now be used to provide in depth knowledge of flow physics, for example, in areas such as transition and real wall roughness effects. This can be used to inform RANS and lower order modeling (LOM). For some flows, LES can now even be used for design. Existing literature is used to show the potential of LES for a range of flows in different zones of the engine. Based on flow taxonomy, best practices including RANS/LES zonalization, meshing requirements, and turbulent inflow conditions are introduced, leading to the proposal of a tentative expert system for industrial use. In this way, LES becomes a well controlled tool, suitable for design use and reduces the burden on the end user. The problem sizes tackled however have lagged behind potential computing power, hence future LES use at scale requires substantial progress in several key areas. Current and future solver technologies are thus examined and the potential current and future use of LES is considered.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleFuture Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aeroâ€گengines
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
identifier doi10.1115/1.4029363
journal fristpage81005
journal lastpage81005
identifier eissn1528-8900
treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record