Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft ApplicationsSource: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004::page 41002DOI: 10.1115/1.4030436Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In this paper, four convex models (interval, parallelepiped, ellipsoidal, and superellipsoidal analyses) are introduced to describe the available data on uncertainty parameters for the engine’s crankshaft. The paper first evaluates the smallest area, such as box, ellipse, parallelogram, and super ellipse, which enclose the available data. Then, the Tchebycheff inequality is employed to inflate the uncertain domain to address the problem of forecasting data, i.e., variables taking values beyond the recorded uncertain data, as a limited amount of samples are used to construct the convex models. The minimum areas before and after the inflation are evaluated. Subsequently, the maximum stresses before and after the inflation of uncertain domain based on the areas of the convex models are obtained. The domain that predicts the minimum of the maximum stresses is declared as the best bounding figure, along with the attendant uncertainty model.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Elishakoff, I. | |
contributor author | Fu, C. M. | |
contributor author | Jiang, C. | |
contributor author | Ni, B. Y. | |
contributor author | Han, X. | |
contributor author | Chen, G. S. | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:14:29Z | |
date available | 2017-05-09T01:14:29Z | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier issn | 2332-9017 | |
identifier other | RISK_1_4_041002.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156886 | |
description abstract | In this paper, four convex models (interval, parallelepiped, ellipsoidal, and superellipsoidal analyses) are introduced to describe the available data on uncertainty parameters for the engine’s crankshaft. The paper first evaluates the smallest area, such as box, ellipse, parallelogram, and super ellipse, which enclose the available data. Then, the Tchebycheff inequality is employed to inflate the uncertain domain to address the problem of forecasting data, i.e., variables taking values beyond the recorded uncertain data, as a limited amount of samples are used to construct the convex models. The minimum areas before and after the inflation are evaluated. Subsequently, the maximum stresses before and after the inflation of uncertain domain based on the areas of the convex models are obtained. The domain that predicts the minimum of the maximum stresses is declared as the best bounding figure, along with the attendant uncertainty model. | |
publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
title | Comparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 1 | |
journal issue | 4 | |
journal title | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4030436 | |
journal fristpage | 41002 | |
journal lastpage | 41002 | |
tree | ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |