Show simple item record

contributor authorElishakoff, I.
contributor authorFu, C. M.
contributor authorJiang, C.
contributor authorNi, B. Y.
contributor authorHan, X.
contributor authorChen, G. S.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:14:29Z
date available2017-05-09T01:14:29Z
date issued2015
identifier issn2332-9017
identifier otherRISK_1_4_041002.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/156886
description abstractIn this paper, four convex models (interval, parallelepiped, ellipsoidal, and superellipsoidal analyses) are introduced to describe the available data on uncertainty parameters for the engine’s crankshaft. The paper first evaluates the smallest area, such as box, ellipse, parallelogram, and super ellipse, which enclose the available data. Then, the Tchebycheff inequality is employed to inflate the uncertain domain to address the problem of forecasting data, i.e., variables taking values beyond the recorded uncertain data, as a limited amount of samples are used to construct the convex models. The minimum areas before and after the inflation are evaluated. Subsequently, the maximum stresses before and after the inflation of uncertain domain based on the areas of the convex models are obtained. The domain that predicts the minimum of the maximum stresses is declared as the best bounding figure, along with the attendant uncertainty model.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleComparison of Uncertainty Analyses for Crankshaft Applications
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue4
journal titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4030436
journal fristpage41002
journal lastpage41002
treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record